7 And 8 Megana Way Braishfield Romsey Hampshire SO51 0QD Data via plota.co.uk

26/01738/TPOS - TREE WORKS WITHIN TPO - SOUTH Decided

Proposal

(T1) Oak - Reduce South West canopy overhanging garden by 1.5 - 2m from the crown tips, crown raise the Southern canopy branches overhanging the gardens by up to 2m and crown raise Northern side of canopy by removal of two lower primary branches (T2) Oak - Reduce Southern side of canopy over house by 1- 1.5m by removal of epicormic growth, Reduce lower Western canopy by up to 2m Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
11 Aug 2026
✓
Consultation
11 Aug 2026
✓
Part consent/part refusal
7 Oct 2026

Part consent/part refusal on 7 Oct 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Oct 2026

Site constraints 6

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Registered park or garden 108 m away: Sir Harold Hillier Gardens and Arboretum; Radon affected area, class 3; Priority habitat 49 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Building

Floor area121 m² (1,302 sq ft)
Energy ratingE (54 out of 100), could reach C
PropertyDetached bungalow, 5 habitable rooms
Built1950 to 1966
HeatingBoiler and radiators, oil
WallsCavity wall, as built, no insulation (assumed)

From the energy performance certificate lodged in February 2020, the latest held for this property. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in Test Valley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
TREE WORKS WITHIN TPO - SOUTH
Postcode
SO51 0QD
Received
10 Aug 2026
Validated
11 Aug 2026
Ward
AMPFIELD & BRAISHFIELD
Parish
BRAISHFIELD
Case officer
Show
Target decision
6 Oct 2026
Decision
PART CONSENT/PART REFUSAL
Decision date
7 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Orrin Patterson

Public comments

1comment received
1 neutral

Last counted 7 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15145781
Planning Portal ref
PP-15145781
Consultation
11 Aug 2026
Comments by
1 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
6 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
Test Valley
Planning Authority Score
7.8/10
Good
#32 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Test Valley is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #71 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Test Valley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #68 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #62 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #71 of 296
31%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #61 of 296
70%
Minor dwellings approved
96 decided (1-9 homes)
80%
Major dwellings approved
5 decided (10+ homes)
88%
Change of use approved
50 decided
996
Total decisions
72 refused in the year to March 2026

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.