Car Park Area Opposite Servite House, Beck Close, Lonson, SE13 Data via plota.co.uk

26/2877/TC - Tree works in a Conservation Area Withdrawn

Proposal

T1. Horse Chestnut. 15 metres in height. 10 metres in width. Reduce by 3 metres all round, leaving the tree 12 metres in height and 7 metres in width. Tree is overgrown and a few limbs are blocking the car park. T2. Sycamore Tree. 18 metres in height. 8 metres in width. Reduce by 3.5 metres, leaving the tree 14.5 metres in height and 4.5 metres in width. Tree is overgrown and a few limbs are blocking the car park T3. Sycamore Tree. 18 metres in height. 8 metres in width. reduce by 3.5 metres, leaving the tree 14.5 metres in height and 4.5 metres in width. Tree is overgrown and a few limbs are blocking the car park. T4. Sycamore Tree, 18 metres in height. 6 metres in width. reduce by 3.5 metres, leaving the tree 14.5 metres in height and 2.5 metres in width. Tree is overgrown and needs pollarding to support the health. T5. Sycamore Tree. 14 metres in height. 6 metres in width. reduce by 2 metres, leaving the tree 12 metres in height and 4 metres in width. Tree is overgrown and needs reduction to support the health. Situated along Beck Close in the car park. T6. Sycamore Tree. 14 metres in height. 4 metres in width. reduce by 2 metres, leaving the tree 12 metres in height and 2 metres in width. Tree is overgrown and needs reduction to support the health. T7. Sycamore Tree. 16 metres in height. 6 metres in width. reduce by 2.5 metres, leaving the tree 13.5 metres in height and 3.5 metres in width. Situated along Beck Close in the car park. T8. Sycamore Tree. 16 metres in height. 8 metres in width.reduce by 2.5 metres, leaving the tree 13.5 metres in height and 5.5 metres in width. Tree is overgrown and a few limbs are overgrowing into the car park. G1. Ivy and saplings. Cut down to fence height. T10. Sycamore Tree. 7 metres in height. 4 metres in width. Cut down to fence height as going to grow to big for its location. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
6 Oct 2026
−
Withdrawn
8 Oct 2026

Withdrawn on 8 Oct 2026 · Delegation · Last checked 17 Oct 2026

Site constraints 8

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Air quality management area: Greenwich AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
National infrastructure project 240 m away: Thames Tideway Tunnel
The site is 240 m from the project boundary. Waste water treatment, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted. Also within 2 km: London Strategic Heat Main Project (at pre-application, 1013 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Local nature reserve 236 m away: Brookmill Road
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Opportunity area
Where the London Plan expects significant growth.
Boundaries are indicative and the borough holds the detailed plan.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Inside the Greenwich built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 5 (very good), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square.
Not affected
Not green belt · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI), Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Greenwich - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Greenwich
Application type
Tree works in a Conservation Area
Received
6 Oct 2026
Ward
GREENWICH PARK
Case officer
Show
Decision
Withdrawn
Decision date
8 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegation
Applicant
Show
Agent
Acacia Tree Surgeons Ltd

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 17 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15276801
Planning Portal ref
PP-15276801
Env. assessment
No
Greenwich
Planning Authority Score
5.4/10
Average
#123 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Greenwich is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #76 out of 296. Only 29% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Greenwich is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 78% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 78% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Greenwich decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
77%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #278 of 296
78%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #287 of 296
75%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #76 of 296
29%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #49 of 296
60%
Minor dwellings approved
114 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
13 decided (10+ homes)
66%
Change of use approved
195 decided
1,468
Total decisions
331 refused in the year to March 2026