Hertford Place Denham Way Maple Cross Hertfordshire Data via plota.co.uk

26/0361/TPO - Works to trees covered by a Tree Pres O Approved

Proposal

T1 (London plane) ? Raise lower canopy to approximately 7-8m from ground level to appropriate pruning point. Removing mainly pendulous branches and retaining large diameter lower limb. Reduce south side of canopy laterally to provide c. 3m clearance from building. T2 (Sycamore) ? Raise lower canopy to approximately 7-8m from ground level to appropriate pruning point. Removing lower branches back to main stem. Reduce south side of canopy laterally to provide c. 3m clearance from building. T3 (London plane) ? Raise lower canopy to approximately 7-8m from ground level to appropriate pruning point. Reduce south side of canopy laterally to provide c. 3m clearance from building. T4 (Monkey Puzzle) ? Fell to ground level (tree is dead) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
4 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
15 Apr 2026

Approved on 15 Apr 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
National infrastructure project about 211 m away: Expansion of Heathrow Airport (Third Runway), at pre-application; Green belt about 66 m away: London.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Three Rivers - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to trees covered by a Tree Pres O
Postcode
WD3 9YS
Received
4 Mar 2026
Validated
4 Mar 2026
Ward
Chorleywood South And Maple Cross
Parish
Non-Parished
Case officer
Show
Target decision
29 Apr 2026
Decision
Consent given on work to Tree apps
Decision date
15 Apr 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Seed Arboriculture Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 42 days from validation, 14 days slower than Three Rivers's median of 28 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 89% of tree and landscaping works here are.

92%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
322decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Three Rivers in the last twelve months, from validation. Three Rivers decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14750318
Planning Portal ref
PP-14750318
Statutory expiry
29 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Three Rivers
Planning Authority Score
7.3/10
Good
#54 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Three Rivers is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #30 out of 296. Only 24% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Three Rivers decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #145 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #184 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #30 of 296
24%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #28 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
94%
Change of use approved
17 decided
819
Total decisions
86 refused in the year to March 2026