Wildfowlers Shore Road Bosham Chichester West Sussex PO18 8QL Data via plota.co.uk

26/00360/DOC - Discharge of Conditions Refused

Proposal

Discharge of condition 4 (Hard and Soft Landscaping) from planning permission . Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
16 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
25 Feb 2026
✗
Refused
22 Apr 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 22 Apr 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 26 Jul 2026

Associated applications 3

  • Part of

    AmendmentApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 4 discharged

Site constraints 9

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Chichester Harbour National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Special area of conservation about 35 m away: Solent Maritime
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
SSSI about 35 m away: Chichester Harbour SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Inside the Bosham built-up area; Priority habitat about 43 m away: No main habitat but additional habitats present.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 1

Last sold for £1,726,500 in June 2004. Detached house, freehold.

15 June 2004£1,726,500

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Chichester - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Chichester
Application type
Discharge of Conditions
Postcode
PO18 8QL
Received
16 Feb 2026
Validated
25 Feb 2026
Ward
Harbour Villages
Parish
Bosham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 Apr 2026
Decision
REFUSE
Decision date
22 Apr 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Ian Adam-Smith Architects

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14682706
Planning Portal ref
PP-14682706
Statutory expiry
22 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Chichester
Planning Authority Score
8.9/10
Excellent
#6 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Chichester is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #10 out of 296. Only 18% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Chichester decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #127 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #72 of 296
93%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #10 of 296
18%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #15 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
110 decided (1-9 homes)
76%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
74%
Change of use approved
34 decided
935
Total decisions
107 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.