Bowlee Playing Fields, Heywood Old Road, Middleton, Manchester, M24 4SD Data via plota.co.uk

PL/2026/0738 - Full planning permission Under Consultation

Proposal

Demolition and replacement of community centre to provide Community Sports and Wellbeing Hub (Hybrid Use Class F2/E(d)) comprising community sports and wellbeing facilities; football club training and community pitches; drainage and earthworks; provision of cricket nets; with associated hard and soft landscaping, parking, storage container, lighting, enclosures and boundary treatments. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
14 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 13 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 9 Oct 2026, from Rochdale's recent demolitions.

Documents 55

Plans & drawings 22

PDF BOWLEE-POZ-XX-XX-D-A-11001-P02 Existing Location Plan Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 3230-MDK-XX-ZZ-DR-Y-1 Proposed Floor Plans-Rev 03 Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BOWLEE-POZ-XX-ZZ-D-A-13501-P01 Proposed Elevation - South and West Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BOWLEE-POZ-XX-ZZ-D-A-11050-P02 Demolition Location Plan Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BOWLEE-POZ-XX-ZZ-D-A-14500-P01 Proposed GA Sections Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 161-106-B-P1 Proposed Community Pitch Site Sections Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 161-104-P6 Early Stage Earthworks Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 161-107-P1 Typical Pitch Construction Sections Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BOWLEE-POZ-XX-ZZ-D-A-13500-P01 Proposed Elevation - North and East Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 3230-MDK-XX-ZZ-DR-Y-2 Proposed Elevations-Rev 04 Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 161-104-A-P1 Early Stage Earthworks Cut&Fill Analysis Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BOWLEE-POZ-XX-XX-D-A-11000-E Proposed Location Plan Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BOWLEE-POZ-XX-00-D-A-12500-P02 Proposed Ground Floor Plan Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 3230-MDK-XX-ZZ-DR-Y- 5 Proposed Sections Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 161-105-P4 Site Layout Plan Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BOWLEE-POZ-XX-RF-D-A-12550-P02 Proposed Roof Plan - Level Roof Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BOWLEE-POZ-XX-XX-D-A-11010-A-Existing Location Plan - Proposed Phasing Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 1341-RFM-XX-00-DR-L-0501-S2-P02 Planting Strategy Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 1341-RFM-XX-00-DR-L-0101-P03 Illustrative General Arrangement Plan Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 161-103-P6 Early Stage Proposed Site Levels Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 1341-RFM-XX-00-DR-L-0101-S2-P05 Illustrative General Arrangement Plan Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 161-106-A-P1 Proposed RAFC Pitch Site Sections Plan · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 7

Green belt: Merseyside and Greater Manchester
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Public footpath about 30 m away; National infrastructure project about 1338 m away: M60/M62/M66 Simister Island; Coalfield, development low risk area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rochdale - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rochdale
Application type
Full planning permission
Postcode
M24 4SD
Received
13 Aug 2026
Validated
14 Aug 2026
Ward
West Middleton
Parish
Middleton Township
Case officer
Show
Target decision
13 Nov 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Kate Goodwin (Enabl)

Decision outlook

Day 56, past Rochdale's usual 54 days for demolitions. 93% are decided within thirteen weeks, so most likely by 13 Nov 2026.

Day 560 days to the 56-day target
64%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
31decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Rochdale in the last twelve months, from validation. Rochdale decision record →

Public comments

4comments received
4 neutral

Last counted 5 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Rochdale
Planning Authority Score
2.4/10
Poor
#259 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rochdale is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #215 out of 296. 52% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rochdale decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
87%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #176 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #221 of 296
54%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #215 of 296
52%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #237 of 296
81%
Minor dwellings approved
52 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
78%
Change of use approved
60 decided
609
Total decisions
82 refused in the year to March 2026