Land Off Heywood Old Road, Middleton, Rochdale , OL10 2QN Data via plota.co.uk

PL/2026/0679 - Public Service Infrastructure Development Under Consultation

Proposal

Construction of an SEN school, with associated access, parking, landscaping, drainage, land regrading and associated works. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
28 Jul 2026
✓
Validated
5 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 14 Oct 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision by 22 Oct 2026, from Rochdale's recent full applications.

Documents 49

Statements & assessments 21

PDF Topographical Survey Plan · 5 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning Statement (05.08.2026) Report · 5 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning Statement - Appendix 1 - Site Appraisal Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Crime Impact Statement - Version A (20/03/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Statement of Community Involvement (16/07/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Air Quality Assessment (03/03/26) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Flood Risk Assessment (16/07/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) Assessment Report (03/06/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Preliminary Risk Assessment (24/12/2025) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Arboricultural Survey and Layout & Tree Protection Plan Plan · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Energy and Sustainability Statement (20/07/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Noise Impact Assessment (NIA) (09/07/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Exterior Lighting Design and Impact Assessment (09/07/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Arboricultural Implication Study (25/02/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Great Crested Newt eDNA Statement (01/07/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning Statement - Appendix 2 - Landscape Visual Assessment (LVA) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Drainage Statement (July 2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Design and Access Statement - Revision B Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Transport Assessment (15/07/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) Metric Calculation Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Phase 2 Geo-Envionmental Investigation, Risk Assessment and Outline Remediation Strategy (13/03/2026) Supporting Report · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area; National infrastructure project 1961 m away: M60/M62/M66 Simister Island; Green belt 8 m away: Merseyside and Greater Manchester.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rochdale - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rochdale
Application type
Public Service Infrastructure Development
Postcode
OL10 2QN
Received
28 Jul 2026
Validated
5 Aug 2026
Ward
West Middleton
Parish
Middleton Township
Case officer
Show
Target decision
14 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 65 of the 56-day target. Rochdale usually decides full applications by day 70.

Day 655 days to the predicted decision (day 70)
42%decided within 8 weeks
82%approved
116decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Rochdale in the last twelve months, from validation. Rochdale decision record →

Public comments

5comments received
5 neutral

Last counted 8 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Rochdale
Planning Authority Score
2.4/10
Poor
#259 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rochdale is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #215 out of 296. 52% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rochdale decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
87%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #176 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #221 of 296
54%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #215 of 296
52%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #237 of 296
81%
Minor dwellings approved
52 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
78%
Change of use approved
60 decided
609
Total decisions
82 refused in the year to March 2026