Street Record Chearsley Footpath 19 Chearsley Buckinghamshire Data via plota.co.uk

PL/26/06592/KA - Works to trees in Conservation Area Approved
Trees & landscaping

Proposal

Fell 1 x Sycamore (T1) to ground level and prune around the BT overhead cable to provide a clearance of 0.5 metres from the line to 1 x Norway Maple (T2) Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
14 Aug 2026
✓
Consultation
25 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
18 Sept 2026

Approved on 18 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 18 Sept 2026

Documents 5

Decision & officer reports 1

PDF DECISION Decision Notice · 18 Sept 2026 View ↗

Application forms 1

PDF APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED Application Form and Certificate · 14 Aug 2026 View ↗

Other documents 3

IMG 8843 T1 Additional Information · 14 Aug 2026 View ↗ IMG 8843 T1 STEM LOCATION Additional Information · 14 Aug 2026 View ↗ IMG 8843 T2 Additional Information · 14 Aug 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 7

Public footpath 0 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Chearsley conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
7 listed buildings within 150 m
Nearest: Arden Cottage, Grade II, 6 m away · 7 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 7 with distances
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 6
An estimated 30% or more of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Chearsley built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Buckinghamshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

21 Sept 2026Pending

Chearsley House Church Lane Chearsley Buckinghamshire HP18 0DF

Removal of T1 (Silver Birch), to be replaced with a medium sized shrub and felli...

PL/26/07279/KA
3 Aug 2026Approved

The Old Vicarage Aylesbury Road Chearsley Buckinghamshire HP18 0BS

Application for approval of detail subject to conditions 5 (Bricks) and 6 (Lime ...

PL/26/06212/CONDA

Important details

Council
Buckinghamshire
Application type
Works to trees in Conservation Area
Received
14 Aug 2026
Validated
14 Aug 2026
Ward
Long Crendon
Parish
Chearsley
Case officer
Show
Target decision
25 Sept 2026
Decision
TPO shall not be made
Decision date
18 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
4 Seasons Tree Care Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 35 days from validation, 7 days faster than Buckinghamshire's median of 42 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 91% of tree and landscaping works here are.

81%decided within 8 weeks
91%approved
931decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Buckinghamshire in the last twelve months, from validation. Buckinghamshire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 18 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
25 Aug 2026
Comments by
15 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
25 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
Buckinghamshire
Planning Authority Score
1.3/10
Poor
#284 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Buckinghamshire is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #280 out of 296. 55% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (86%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Buckinghamshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #217 of 296
86%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #241 of 296
34%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #280 of 296
55%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #248 of 296
76%
Minor dwellings approved
491 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
71 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
131 decided
4,446
Total decisions
690 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings