Land And Buildings South Of Dodington Lane Dodington South Gloucestershire BS37 6SD Data via plota.co.uk

P25/01467/F - Full Planning Refused

Proposal

Demolition of existing buildings. Erection of 1 no. new self-build dwelling with associated works. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
16 Jun 2025
✓
Validated
2 Jul 2025
✓
Consultation
15 Jul 2025
✗
Refused
6 Mar 2026
✗
Appeal dismissed

Refused on 6 Mar 2026 · DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE · Last checked 15 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by South Gloucestershire Development Management Committee on 5 Mar 2026.

Refused by 5 votes to 3

No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.

  • The agent said the scheme redeveloped a derelict site and should be seen as a positive grey belt proposal, with no objections from ecology, drainage or transport consultees.
  • Officers said the walking and cycling routes to local services were not safe, pushing residents to rely on cars, and recommended refusal.
  • Members voted 5 to 3 to refuse planning permission for the reasons in the officer report.
Read how the committee decided The accessibility concerns raised by officers, and why members refused the housing scheme. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of South Gloucestershire's committee minutes of 5 Mar 2026.

Documents 32

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Green belt: Bath and Bristol
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
National landscape about 105 m away: Cotswolds
Outside the landscape; its setting can still be raised.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Also on the record
Registered park or garden about 122 m away: Dodington House; 4 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; National infrastructure project about 1756 m away: Lime Down Solar Project.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 15 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Gloucestershire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning
Postcode
BS37 6SD
Received
16 Jun 2025
Validated
2 Jul 2025
Ward
Boyd Valley
Parish
Dodington Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
3 Dec 2025
Decision
Refusal
Decision date
6 Mar 2026
Decision level
DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
Applicant
Show
Agent
LPC (Trull) Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 247 days from validation, 172 days slower than South Gloucestershire's median of 75 for full applications. Refused, as 13% of full applications here are.

35%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
413decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by South Gloucestershire in the last twelve months, from validation. South Gloucestershire decision record →

Public comments

2comments received
2 supporting

8 neighbours consulted · Last counted 15 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14101537
Planning Portal ref
PP-14101537
Comments by
5 Aug 2025
Site or press notice
15 Jul 2025
Statutory expiry
3 Dec 2025
Env. assessment
No
South Gloucestershire
Planning Authority Score
2.8/10
Poor
#239 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

South Gloucestershire ranks #178 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. South Gloucestershire is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 83% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 83% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Gloucestershire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #210 of 296
83%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #263 of 296
61%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #178 of 296
45%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #195 of 296
75%
Minor dwellings approved
220 decided (1-9 homes)
93%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
84%
Change of use approved
105 decided
1,585
Total decisions
245 refused in the year to March 2026