Old Hall Cragg Lane Newton Alfreton DE55 5TN Data via plota.co.uk

26/00174/TCON Approved

Proposal

Tree works to T1-Lawson Cypress-remove, T2-Holly-remove, T3 & T4-Lawson Cypress-remove, T5-Common Holly-remove, T6 & T7-Common Lime - epicormic removal, T8-Crown reduction 3.2m, T9-Common Lime - Crown Reduction 3.2m, remove epicormic growth & re-pollard, T10 & T13-Common Beech - Remove, T12 Scots Pine - remove deadwood greater than 25mm, T14 Common Beech-Remove deadwood, T16 Sorbus-Remove, T20-Laburnum - Remove, T22-English Yew - Remove deadwood, T23 - Remove, T24 Common Ash - Remove deadwood, T25 Cypress-Remove deadwood, T26 Wild Cherry - Remove deadwood, T28-Common Beech - Crown reduction by 3.2 & remove deadwood, T29 Wild Cherry - Remove, T30 Lawson Cypress - remove deadwood, T31 Wild Cherry - Remove, T32 Cotoneaster - remove, T33-English Yew Remove deadwood, T34-English Yew Remove Deadwood, T35-Lawson Cypress Remove Deadwood, T36-Goat Willow - Crown reduction by 3m sever ivy at base, T37-Blue Cedar - Crown reduction 3.2, spread reduction by 1.5m & remove deadwood, T39-Pine - remove deadwood, T40-Sorbus - Remove, T43 - Mulberry-sever ivy at base, T44- Lawson Cypress - Remove deadwood, T45-Norway Spruce - Remove deadwood, T46, T47, T48 & T49-Common Limes - Crown reduction by 3.5m Epicormic Removal, T50-Hawthorn - Crown lift to 3m & remove all deadwood, T51-Common Pear Remove, T52-Common Beach Remove deadwood & crown reduction, T53-Common Beech Remove deadwood, T54 & T55-Common Lime - Pollard, T56-Common Beech Remove, T57-Common Lime Pollard, T58-Common Lime remove epicormic growth Re-Pollard and T59-Common Lime Epicormic Removal and Pollard. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
11 May 2026
✓
Validated
20 May 2026
✓
Approved
23 Jun 2026

Approved on 23 Jun 2026 · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Site constraints 7

3 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Two Sets of Gatepiers and Attached Wall at Newton Old Hall, Grade II, about 15 m from the postcode pin · 1 Grade II*, 2 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 3 with distances
Historic England ↗
Newton conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Public footpath about 9 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Newton and Blackwell built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Bolsover - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Bolsover
Postcode
DE55 5TN
Received
11 May 2026
Validated
20 May 2026
Decision
Determine NOT to Make a TPO
Decision date
23 Jun 2026

How this decision compares

Decided in 34 days from validation, about the council's usual 37 days. Approved, as 100% of tree and landscaping works here are.

100%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
29decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Bolsover in the last twelve months, from validation. Bolsover decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14922352
Planning Portal ref
PP-14922352
Bolsover
Planning Authority Score
8.2/10
Excellent
#20 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Bolsover is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #57 out of 296. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 98% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
98% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Bolsover decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
96%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #8 of 296
98%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #11 of 296
77%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #57 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #98 of 296
98%
Minor dwellings approved
46 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
91%
Change of use approved
35 decided
286
Total decisions
11 refused in the year to March 2026