LAND COORDINATES 487209 140616 LOWICKS ROAD RUSHMOOR FARNHAM Application for permission in principle for the… Data via plota.co.uk

PIP/2026/00295 - PERMISSION IN PRINCIPLE Refused

Proposal

Application For Permission In Principle For The Erection Of 2 Dwellings; Construction Of An Additional Vehicular Access Following Demolition Of Existing Building And Hardstanding. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
19 Feb 2026
✗
Refused
30 Apr 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 30 Apr 2026 · Last checked 25 Sept 2026

Site constraints 8

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Surrey Hills National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Article 4 direction
Land encompassing Lane End and Millbridge (1958). Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Special protection area 213 m away: Thursley, Hankley & Frensham Commons
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
SSSI 213 m away: Thursley, Hankley & Frensham Commons SSSI; Nature recovery project: Heathland Connections; Inside the Rushmoor built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Waverley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Waverley
Application type
PERMISSION IN PRINCIPLE
Postcode
GU10
Received
19 Feb 2026
Validated
19 Feb 2026
Ward
Western Commons
Parish
Frensham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
26 Mar 2026
Decision
REFUSED
Decision date
30 Apr 2026
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 70 days from validation, 13 days slower than Waverley's median of 57 for new homes. Refused, as 40% of new homes here are.

49%decided within 8 weeks
60%approved
123decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Waverley in the last twelve months, from validation. Waverley decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
9 Mar 2026
Waverley
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#133 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Waverley ranks #144 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Waverley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
88%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #163 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #141 of 296
66%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #144 of 296
38%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #134 of 296
70%
Minor dwellings approved
151 decided (1-9 homes)
59%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
67%
Change of use approved
21 decided
1,378
Total decisions
161 refused in the year to March 2026