Pizza Hut (uk) Ltd, Rom Valley Way Romford RM7 0AN Data via plota.co.uk

P0902.26 Approved

Proposal

Alteration of existing elevation to rearrange fenestration including moving of door arrangement and minor alteration to roof profile below ridgeline. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
28 Jul 2026
✓
Validated
30 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
1 Oct 2026

Approved on 1 Oct 2026 · Last checked 2 Oct 2026

Site constraints 6

In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From rivers. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Archaeological priority area: Early medieval settlement site.
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Havering AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Also on the record
Flood defence about 33 m from the postcode pin (natural high ground, designed for a 1 in 70 year flood); Inside the Havering built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 5 (very good), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Havering - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Havering
Postcode
RM7 0AN
Received
28 Jul 2026
Validated
30 Jul 2026
Ward
St Albans
Case officer
Show
Target decision
1 Oct 2026
Decision
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Decision date
1 Oct 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Tim Simpson

How this decision compares

Decided in 63 days from validation, 7 days slower than Havering's median of 56 for extensions. Approved, as 89% of extensions here are.

53%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
1,082decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Havering in the last twelve months, from validation. Havering decision record →

Havering
Planning Authority Score
2.5/10
Poor
#251 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Havering is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #202 out of 296. 47% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Havering is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 83% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 83% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Havering decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
74%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #290 of 296
83%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #262 of 296
56%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #202 of 296
47%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #207 of 296
42%
Minor dwellings approved
156 decided (1-9 homes)
83%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
29%
Change of use approved
101 decided
1,501
Total decisions
385 refused in the year to March 2026