Princess Mary Court, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 3BG Data via plota.co.uk

2026/0765/01/TPO - Works to Protected Trees Decided

Proposal

Sycamore (T45 On Sketch Plan) – Remove, Sycamore (T46) – Remove, Sycamore (T47) – Remove, Ash (T52) – Remove, Ash – (T55) – Remove, Sycamore (T56) – Remove, Sycamore (T57) – Remove, Sycamore (T58) – Remove, Sycamore (T60) – Remove, Ash, Holly, Sycamore and Thorn (Group 51) - All Ash within group have Ash Die Back. Group to be thinned to leave 3 or 4 stems of Sycamore, leave Thorn and Holly understory, Oak (T49 on Sketch Plan) - Remove dead and damaged branches – Prune, Thorn (T53) - crown lift over the road (TPO Application ) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
5 May 2026
✓
Split Decision with conditions
9 Jul 2026

Split Decision with conditions on 9 Jul 2026 · Delegated decision · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Site constraints 7

Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Brandling Village conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Article 4 direction
Jesmond and Heaton. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Also on the record
2 listed buildings within 150 m; Registered park or garden 124 m away: St Andrews Cemetery; Tree preservation order 11 m away: Northern Counties School for the Deaf; Inside the Newcastle upon Tyne built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Newcastle upon Tyne - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to Protected Trees
Postcode
NE2 3BG
Received
5 May 2026
Validated
5 May 2026
Ward
Jesmond
Parish
Not Within A Parish Boundary
Case officer
Show
Target decision
30 Jun 2026
Decision
Split Decision with conditions
Decision date
9 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Tyne Valley Woodlands

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
30 Jun 2026
Newcastle upon Tyne
Planning Authority Score
4.9/10
Below average
#154 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Newcastle upon Tyne is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #205 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Newcastle upon Tyne decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #113 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #86 of 296
56%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #205 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #165 of 296
84%
Minor dwellings approved
37 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
22 decided (10+ homes)
71%
Change of use approved
70 decided
1,005
Total decisions
103 refused in the year to March 2026