Rosendale Road, Between Norwood Road, Tritton Road And Roads Leading To Gipsy Hill London SE24 Data via plota.co.uk

26/01345/EIASCR - EIA Screening Approved

Proposal

Screening Opinion in respect of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) pursuant to Regulation 6 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations, 2017 for the creation of a cycle lane, along with changes to junction geometry, footways, signage, vehicle and cycle parking and other associated works to the highway along Rosendale Road, as Phase 3 of the Brockwell Park to Gipsy Hill Healthy Route between the A205 South Circular and Park Hall Road (connecting to the Phase 1 and Phase 2 two-way cycle tracks installed along the eastern side of Rosendale Road and connecting south to future Phase 4 cycle way leading to Gypsy Hill Station). Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
27 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
29 Apr 2026

Approved on 29 Apr 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Site constraints 5

Air quality management area: Southwark AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Conservation area about 1 m away: Gipsy Hill
The edge of the area; work outside it can still affect its setting.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Local nature reserve about 308 m away: Dulwich Upper Wood
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Also on the record
Inside the Southwark built-up area; Designated open space about 33 m away.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Lambeth - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Lambeth
Application type
EIA Screening
Postcode
SE19 1PJ
Received
27 Apr 2026
Validated
27 Apr 2026
Ward
West Dulwich
Decision
Grant Permission
Decision date
29 Apr 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 2 days from validation, 64 days faster than Lambeth's median of 66 for utility and infrastructure works. Approved, as 85% of utility and infrastructure works here are.

37%decided within 8 weeks
85%approved
55decided in the last year

Plota live figures for utility and infrastructure works decided by Lambeth in the last twelve months, from validation. Lambeth decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Env. assessment
No
Lambeth
Planning Authority Score
2.7/10
Poor
#242 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Lambeth ranks #164 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 47% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Lambeth is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 81% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 81% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Lambeth decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
78%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #274 of 296
81%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #273 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #164 of 296
47%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #209 of 296
46%
Minor dwellings approved
70 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
42%
Change of use approved
53 decided
1,784
Total decisions
396 refused in the year to March 2026