Main Street Cosby Data via plota.co.uk

26/0351/TC - Conservation Area Tree Application Approved

Proposal

Reduce T41(False Acacia) by re pollarding to 7 m and cutting back lower lateral branches by 1.5 m on the south and east sides. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
23 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
27 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
5 Jun 2026

Approved on 5 Jun 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Site constraints 6

9 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Brook's Edge, Grade II, about 18 m from the postcode pin · 1 Grade II*, 8 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 9 with distances
Historic England ↗
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Cosby conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Also on the record
Flood defence about 8 m from the postcode pin (natural high ground); Inside the Cosby built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Blaby - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Blaby
Application type
Conservation Area Tree Application
Postcode
LE9 1RQ
Received
23 Apr 2026
Validated
27 Apr 2026
Target decision
8 Jun 2026
Decision
Application Permitted
Decision date
5 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Totally Trees Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 39 days from validation, about the council's usual 42 days. Approved, as 99% of tree and landscaping works here are.

89%decided within 8 weeks
99%approved
89decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Blaby in the last twelve months, from validation. Blaby decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14882521
Planning Portal ref
PP-14882521
Comments by
19 May 2026
Statutory expiry
8 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Blaby
Planning Authority Score
4.1/10
Below average
#190 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Blaby is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #237 out of 296. 53% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Blaby decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #76 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #50 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #237 of 296
53%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #239 of 296
81%
Minor dwellings approved
32 decided (1-9 homes)
80%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
80%
Change of use approved
35 decided
467
Total decisions
37 refused in the year to March 2026