11 Cheltenham Close Exeter EX4 2EL Data via plota.co.uk

26/0563/TPO - Works to Protected Trees (TPO) Approved

Proposal

Remove dead branches throughout the crown where they present a clear risk of falling into the garden, sheds or boundary fence. Remove broken or hanging branches at risk of detachment, limited to secondary and tertiary branches only, maximum cut diameter 80 mm. Crown lift to provide 2 m clearance above garden level by removing selected small secondary and tertiary branches only, maximum cut diameter 50 mm. Reduce lateral branches on the east aspect by up to 2-3 m, targeting secondary and tertiary branches, maximum cut diameter 80 mm, to trim back the periphery of the crown. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
19 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
1 Jun 2026

Approved on 1 Jun 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Site constraints 3

Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Local nature reserve about 397 m away: Barley Valley; Inside the Exeter built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Exeter - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Exeter
Application type
Works to Protected Trees (TPO)
Postcode
EX4 2EL
Received
19 Apr 2026
Validated
19 Apr 2026
Ward
Exwick
Case officer
Show
Target decision
14 Jun 2026
Decision
Permitted
Decision date
1 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 43 days from validation, 13 days slower than Exeter's median of 30 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 98% of tree and landscaping works here are.

92%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
194decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Exeter in the last twelve months, from validation. Exeter decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14865016
Planning Portal ref
PP-14865016
Statutory expiry
14 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Exeter
Planning Authority Score
3.2/10
Poor
#228 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Exeter is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #214 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (86%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Exeter decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #205 of 296
86%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #242 of 296
54%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #214 of 296
40%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #150 of 296
58%
Minor dwellings approved
31 decided (1-9 homes)
60%
Major dwellings approved
5 decided (10+ homes)
90%
Change of use approved
40 decided
582
Total decisions
86 refused in the year to March 2026