Cleave Farm Road To Cleave Farm East Down EX31 4NX Data via plota.co.uk

81235 - Full Application Pending

Proposal

Retrospective creation of car park, Erection of toilet building with footbridge over stream, siting of shipping container for storage together with conversion and extension to former tennis shed to a sauna/treatment room and seasonal change of use of land to allow siting of a tent for a bar/entertainment purposes Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
22 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
7 Apr 2026
Decision
Expected by 2 Jun 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 11 Sept 2026; it is now day 185.

The consultation period closed on 11 Sept 2026.

Documents 109

Consultation & comments 87

PDF Consultation Response East Down PC · 23 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response SWW cr · 10 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Environmental Health · 9 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Mason L · 28 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Reynolds L · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Holland F · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Pamment L · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Lefebrve M · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Johncock P · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Oboyle C · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation James A · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Thea · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Witts G · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Jones J · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Green N · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Knight H · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Hobbs S · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Lumley B · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Graham S · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Ella · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Baldock B · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Walker R · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Santos C · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Holland F · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Knight J · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Emerson D · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Clark S · 12 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Rose E · 12 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Miles J · 12 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Hoyles B · 12 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Toft R · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Friedrich N · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Blackman H · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation McGill M · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Hanson C · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Pufahl M · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Tomlinson R · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Baxter L · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Long G · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Fidge P · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Cooke S · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Crawford J · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Smale A · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Reynolds E · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Brynony · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Hampton P · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Clinch A · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Kelly T · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Denny P · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Perrin O · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Stevens K · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Richards J · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Caley N · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Longden T · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Trotter K · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Hill T · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Hill K · 8 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Cavender N · 7 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Wright G · 7 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Thompson J · 7 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Notman M · 7 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Young G · 7 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Kelly C · 7 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Reyner J · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Peake J · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Lavis M · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Schmid M · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Roberts K · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Cooper L · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Clinch D · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Stott D · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Lindqvist Jones G · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Mason L · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Lerwill J · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Henry D · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Price K · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Murphy P · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Hanson K · 5 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Verney T · 5 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Boxall E · 5 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Cross T · 5 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Donnelly L · 5 May 2026 View ↗ PDF East Down Parish Council Consultation Response · 29 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Bass S · 27 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Environmental Health Consultant Consultation Response · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Letters of Representation Frohlich E · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response SWW · 16 Apr 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Priority habitat about 11 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in North Devon - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
EX31 4NX
Received
22 Dec 2025
Validated
7 Apr 2026
Ward
MARWOOD
Parish
EAST DOWN
Case officer
Show
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Aaron Cousins

Decision outlook

Day 185, past the statutory target. 91% of agricultural works in North Devon are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 5 Oct 2026.

Day 185129 days past the 56-day target
77%decided within 8 weeks
93%approved
139decided in the last year

Plota live figures for agricultural works decided by North Devon in the last twelve months, from validation. North Devon decision record →

Public comments

81comments received

Last counted 5 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
7 Apr 2026
Comments by
11 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
30 Oct 2026
North Devon
Planning Authority Score
6.1/10
Average
#99 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

North Devon ranks #140 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 98% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
98% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
North Devon decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
94%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #42 of 296
98%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #20 of 296
67%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #140 of 296
45%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #192 of 296
88%
Minor dwellings approved
220 decided (1-9 homes)
87%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
42 decided
939
Total decisions
58 refused in the year to March 2026