Land Adjacent To Hoyle House Beck Bradford Road Brighouse Calderdale Data via plota.co.uk

26/20048/TPO - Tree Preservation Order Approved

Proposal

Reduce height of trees and fell one tree (Tree Preservation Order) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
16 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
17 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
22 Jul 2026

Approved on 22 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 23 Jul 2026

Site constraints 9

Public footpath 5 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From rivers. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: Bradford and South Pennines; Radon affected area, class 2; Tree preservation order 1 m away: Land adjacent to Clifton Beck, Bailiff Bridge; Flood defence 15 m away (natural high ground, designed for a 1 in 50 year flood); Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Brighouse built-up area; Green belt 20 m away: South and West Yorkshire.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Calderdale - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Calderdale
Application type
Tree Preservation Order
Postcode
HD6 2NE
Received
16 Apr 2026
Validated
16 Apr 2026
Ward
Hipperholme And Lightcliffe
Parish
Not In A Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
11 Jun 2026
Decision
Grant Consent
Decision date
22 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Green Canopy Tree Specialists Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 97 days from validation, 46 days slower than Calderdale's median of 51 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 96% of tree and landscaping works here are.

79%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
171decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Calderdale in the last twelve months, from validation. Calderdale decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14864616
Planning Portal ref
PP-14864616
Neighbours
17 Apr 2026
Consultation
17 Apr 2026
Comments by
8 May 2026
Statutory expiry
11 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Calderdale
Planning Authority Score
2.7/10
Poor
#240 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Calderdale ranks #193 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Calderdale decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #192 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #229 of 296
58%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #193 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #223 of 296
73%
Minor dwellings approved
103 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
61 decided
856
Total decisions
121 refused in the year to March 2026