Chilton Woods Mixed Development To North Of Woodhall Business Park Sudbury Suffolk Data via plota.co.uk

DC/26/01417 - Reserved Matters Approved

Proposal

Application for Approval of Reserved Matters pursuant to Outline Planning Permission , Dated 29th March 2018 - Town and Country Planning (Development Planning Procedure) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) - details for matters relating to Appearance, Scale, Layout and Landscaping relating to Open Space, Child Play facilities and associated development, on land adjacent to Phase 1. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
1 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
2 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
6 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
6 Aug 2026

Approved on 6 Aug 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Aug 2026

Documents 25

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 2

Agricultural land, grade 3a, surveyed
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: Natural England's post-1988 ALC field survey (Cambridge). Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Survey report ↗
Also on the record
Scheduled monument 203 m away: Wood Hall moated site.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Babergh Mid Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Reserved Matters
Postcode
CO10 1WL
Received
1 Apr 2026
Validated
2 Apr 2026
Ward
Sudbury North West
Parish
Sudbury
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Jul 2026
Decision
Granted
Decision date
6 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 126 days from validation, 70 days slower than Babergh Mid Suffolk's median of 56 for reserved matters. Approved, as 100% of reserved matters here are.

57%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
19%go to committee

Plota live figures for reserved matters decided by Babergh Mid Suffolk in the last twelve months, from validation. Babergh Mid Suffolk decision record →

Public comments

2comments received
2 objecting

138 neighbours consulted · Last counted 7 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14792155
Planning Portal ref
PP-14792155
Neighbours
9 Apr 2026
Consultation
6 Jul 2026
Comments by
20 Jul 2026
Site or press notice
24 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Babergh Mid Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
7.7/10
Good
#33 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Babergh Mid Suffolk is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #56 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Babergh Mid Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #124 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #68 of 296
77%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #56 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #83 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
160 decided (1-9 homes)
73%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
40 decided
882
Total decisions
99 refused in the year to March 2026