Land at entrance to Zetland Park Park Avenue Redcar Data via plota.co.uk

R/2026/0087/F3 - Regulation 3 Approved

Proposal

Installation of information turret Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
12 Feb 2026
✓
Committee
16 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
16 Apr 2026

Approved on 16 Apr 2026 · Last checked 14 Sept 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Redcar and Cleveland Regulatory Committee on 16 Apr 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the turret was suitably designed, would not harm neighbours, and raised no highway safety concerns.
  • No representations were received, while council engineers and environmental protection officers raised no objection.
  • The committee granted planning permission subject to conditions controlling the start date and approved plans.
Read how the committee decided The proposed turret, officers’ assessment, consultation response, conditions and committee decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Redcar and Cleveland's committee minutes of 16 Apr 2026.

Site constraints 9

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Special protection area about 75 m away: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
SSSI about 75 m away: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Filey Brigg to Newport Bridge about 25 m away; Nature recovery project: Tees Estuary Recovering Nature (TERN); Priority habitat about 30 m away: Coastal sand dunes.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redcar and Cleveland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Regulation 3
Postcode
TS10 3AT
Received
9 Feb 2026
Validated
12 Feb 2026
Case officer
Show
Decision
GRANT DEEMED CONSENT
Decision date
16 Apr 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council

How this decision compares

Decided in 63 days from validation, 8 days slower than Redcar and Cleveland's median of 55 for advertisement consent. Approved, as 87% of advertisement consent here are.

67%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
9,149decided in the last year

Plota live figures for advertisement consent decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent advertisement consent in Redcar and Cleveland to go on. Redcar and Cleveland decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
16 Feb 2026
Comments by
31 Mar 2026
Redcar and Cleveland
Planning Authority Score
6.8/10
Good
#69 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redcar and Cleveland ranks #169 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Only 30% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Rarely extends deadlines
decisions usually arrive on time
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redcar and Cleveland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
96%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #15 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #58 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #169 of 296
30%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #56 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
18 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
37 decided
418
Total decisions
16 refused in the year to March 2026