LAND AND BUILDINGS SOUTH OF KINGSLEY TENNIS CENTRE Forge Road, Kingsley, Bordon, Hampshire Data via plota.co.uk

EHDC-26-0065-FUL - Full Planning Application Approved

Proposal

Proposed replacement hay store and new tack room, day room and toilet. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
24 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
2 Feb 2026
✓
Approved
29 Apr 2026

Approved on 29 Apr 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Site constraints 7

Special protection area about 67 m away: Wealden Heaths Phase II
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Church of All Saints, Grade II, about 15 m from the postcode pin
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Historic England ↗
SSSI about 67 m away: Broxhead and Kingsley Commons SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
National park about 453 m away: South Downs; Inside the Kingsley (East Hampshire) built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in East Hampshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning Application
Postcode
GU35 9NA
Received
24 Jan 2026
Validated
2 Feb 2026
Ward
Binsted, Bentley & Selborne
Parish
Kingsley CP
Case officer
Show
Target decision
5 May 2026
Decision
Permission
Decision date
29 Apr 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Ben Macdonald Associates

How this decision compares

Decided in 86 days from validation, 14 days faster than East Hampshire's median of 100 for demolitions. Approved, as 89% of demolitions here are.

13%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
82decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by East Hampshire in the last twelve months, from validation. East Hampshire decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
23 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
5 May 2026
East Hampshire
Planning Authority Score
1.5/10
Poor
#282 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

East Hampshire is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #293 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 72% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Hampshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
88%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #153 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #173 of 296
24%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #293 of 296
72%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #288 of 296
63%
Minor dwellings approved
72 decided (1-9 homes)
78%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
88%
Change of use approved
24 decided
606
Total decisions
72 refused in the year to March 2026