Two-storey rear extension at The Old Smithy Main Street, Elmley Castle, Pershore

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Wychavon Planning Committee on 11 Dec 2025.

W/25/01805/LBRefusedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

The application sought a two-storey rear extension with a retaining wall, steps and internal alterations to a listed building.

“This application seeks planning permission for a proposed two storey rear extension including retaining wall and steps, as well as internal alterations at The Old Smithy, Main Street, Elmley Castle.”

“The Old Smithy is a Grade II listed building located centrally within the village of Elmley Castle. The listing details for the property state: C17. Rubble stone, partly restored above in modern brick. 3 gabled dormers. Modern casements. Group value.”

Officer report

The site

The Old Smithy is a Grade II listed building in Elmley Castle Conservation Area and within the setting of other listed buildings.

“Development Boundary • Grade II Listed Building (The Old Smithy) • Affecting the setting of Grade II Listed Buildings: Georgian Cottage Street House, Cottage North of Drakeley Cottage Drakeley Cottage Grooms, Queen Elizabeth I Arms Public House, The Cloisters and Brookside • Elmley Castle Conservation Area • Contaminated Land • SSSI - Site of Special Scientific Interest - Distance: • Cotswold National Landscape…”

Officer report

What officers advised

Officers recommended approval, considering the extension subordinate, visually acceptable and unlikely to harm the listed building or conservation area.

“In view of this, policies SWDP6 and SWDP24 of the South Worcestershire Development Plan are relevant when considering the impact of the application proposal. Policy SWDP 6 explains development proposals will be supported where they sustain or enhance the significance of heritage assets (including Conservation Areas), including their setting, SWDP 24 states that harm to or loss of the significance of heritage assets will normally be resisted.”

“Main Street is identified within the Conservation Area Appraisal as one of the principle defining spaces of the village, a sentiment which was echoed in a number of third-party comments. However, due to the limited visibility of the proposal and the use of materials which would be in keeping with both the listed building and the Conservation Area, the proposed extension would not be considered to have an adverse impact on the Conservation Area.”

Officer report

Committee discussion

The committee was told that the application related to a previously refused application and that the recommendation had changed to refusal.

“The Planning Officer outlined the application as the listed building consent for the previous application.”

“The Head of Development Management advised the Committee that the application before them related to the previous application had been refused, the Officer’s recommendation was to be changed to one of refusal.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee refused listed building consent because the application was not justified without consent being granted for the previous application.

“To refuse permission for listed building consent as the application is not justified without consent being granted for the previous application.”

Minutes

Conditions officers proposed

The recommended consent included conditions covering commencement, approved plans, bat measures, materials and archaeological works.

“Unless where required or allowed by other conditions attached to this permission/consent, the development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with the information (including details on the proposed materials) provided on the application form and the following plans/drawings/documents – LP01 Location Plan PP01 Proposed Block Plan PP02 Proposed Plans & Elevations Issue 09 Reason: To define the permission in accordance with Policy SWDP1 and SWDP2 of the South…”

“No building operations hereby permitted shall commence until details of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the rear extension hereby permitted have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.”

Officer report

The members' reasons

The members' reasons are quoted from the minutes above, under “The committee’s decision”.

Sources

  • Wychavon Planning Committee minutes, 11 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Wychavon's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Wychavon
Date
Thursday 11 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Refused, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

32 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →