Seven family homes at Garages Adj 28 Albert Drive, Sheerwater, Woking

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Woking Planning Committee on 10 Mar 2026.

PLAN/2025/0317Approved

The site and surroundings

The site contains three blocks of vacant garages, protected mature trees, a railway, industrial premises and nearby homes accessed from Albert Drive.

“The application site comprises 36 garages forming 3 sperate blocks. The garages are all currently vacant and some are in a poor state of repair. Located within the rear of the site is a dense covering of mature trees which are protected by an area TPO. The railway line is situated to the south east of the site, an industrial area to the west of the site and dwellings to the north and north east. The site is currently accessed from Albert Drive between Nos.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

Earlier permissions covered a dental surgery and outline residential development, neither of which proposed replacement garages.

“PLANNING HISTORY PLAN/2020/0943: Section 73 application for Variation of condition 07 (modified vehicular access) of PLAN/2019/0564 dated 04.09.2019 for the demolition of existing garages and erection of a single storey detached building to be used as a dental surgery (Class D1) with associated landscaping, parking and re-alignment of the existing vehicular access to the highway at Albert Drive, to change the condition to a pre-occupation condition rather than a…”

“PLAN/2019/0564: Demolition of existing garages and erection of a single storey detached building to be used as a dental surgery (Class D1) with associated landscaping, parking and re-alignment of the existing vehicular access to the highway at Albert Drive. Permitted 04.09.2019”

Officer report

Advice from consultees

Highways, flood, trees, contamination, wildlife and environmental health consultees raised no objection subject to conditions, while Network Rail recommended informatives.

“Surrey County Highways: No objection subject to conditions…”

“Environmental Health: No objection subject to conditions…”

Officer report

Residents’ concerns

Objections focused on parking, privacy, overlooking, traffic, construction disruption, noise, pollution, infrastructure, scale and the loss of possible community or parking space.

“4x letters of objection has been received raising the following points: • Already insufficient parking and overcrowded roads, this will make the situation worse • Loss of privacy • Overlooking • Increase in movement of lorries will pose health and safety risks • Increase in noise, air pollution and disruption during construction which will force us to keep our windows closed • Concerned about impact on our garden and garage which shares a wall with the application site •…”

“Neighbours were consulted on the amended plans/additional information and 1x letter of objection was received raising the following points: • Several years ago, 50 houses were demolished and now they want to squeeze 7 homes into a confined space • The 4-6 high blocks of flats in Sheerwater development is not in keeping with the rest of Sheerwater • Garages could have been maintained and rented out or demolished to provide allocated parking for residents • Another suggestion…”

Officer report

Members’ discussion

Members welcomed redevelopment and family homes but discussed contamination, construction traffic, access limitations, access protection, noise, vibration and future parking pressure.

“Members welcomed redevelopment of the long-derelict garage site and commented positively on the provision of family-sized homes.”

“Concerns were expressed regarding construction traffic and potential access limitations through the narrow entrance between Nos. 28 and 30 Albert Drive;”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

Planning permission was granted subject to conditions, legal agreements and amendments in the written update.

“That planning permission be GRANTED subect to conditions and Legal Agreements and amendment detailed in the written update.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

“Concerns were highlighted about future car parking pressures; however, the Committee noted that the development met the Council’s minimum parking standards.”

Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Woking Planning Committee minutes, 10 March 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Woking's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Woking
Date
Tuesday 10 March 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

33 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →