Two additional flats at Monument House, Winchester
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Winchester Planning Committee on 15 Apr 2026.
The site and surroundings
The site is a three-storey unlisted office building in the conservation area, adjoining a more prominent Grade II listed building.
“Monument House, 5 Upper High Street, is an unlisted three-storey building situated on the west side of Upper High Street, within the Winchester Conservation Area.”
“The building forms the southmost building of a terrace of 3 (No.5-7). The middle property, No.6 Upper High Street is Grade II listed building. It stands at a higher level to the adjoining building and is more prominent by virtue of its yellow brickwork and large windows. No.7, on the other side, stands at a similar height to No.5 (the application site), which is narrower and of different design.”
Officer report
Earlier permissions
Earlier permissions covered a rear extension and roof works, and the creation of six residential flats; a related application remained undetermined.
“85/01229/OLD - Erection of single storey second floor rear extension, construction of new roof and other alterations - Post Office, Upper High Street Winchester. Permitted 28th November 1985.”
“24/02048/PNRCOU - Change of use from Class E Office to Residential Flats (Class MA Use Class E to C3). Internal Alterations to Provide 6 No. flats. Prior Approval Required and Approved 14th November 2024.”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
Officers considered the recessed roof, retained parapet and subservient design would preserve the listed building’s prominence and the conservation area.
“In visual terms, the proposal will retain the existing height of the parapet wall. The form and style of the proposed mansard style roof form is of a type seen on historic buildings throughout Winchester. Due to the proposed extension being set back approximately 1.2 metres from the front wall of the building, it is considered to be visually recessive from ground floor level, therefore limiting its visual impact.”
“The design, scale and form of the proposed extension particularly its subservient roof profile, setback position and retention of the existing parapet are considered to preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II listed building at No.6 Upper High Street and maintain its prominence within the terrace. The proposal is also considered to preserve the character and appearance of the Winchester Conservation Area.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The historic environment service and City of Winchester Trust raised no objection, while six representations objected and none supported the proposal.
“Service Lead – Built Environment (Historic Environment) – No objection subject to conditions…”
“The trust considers that this would be an improvement to the street scene and would have the added benefit of helping to safeguard the fabric of the adjacent listed building at No.6 Upper High Street. In view of the location, we are assuming that, if consent is given to this proposal, there will be a condition preventing any occupiers from obtaining a resident’s parking permit.”
Officer report
Concerns from objectors
Concerns included limited parking, overdevelopment, overshadowing, harm to appearance, waste, access, drainage, structural issues and poor-quality housing.
“Objecting Representations received from different addresses citing the following material planning reasons:”
“- Limited car parking spaces – further pressure on road network - Area has reached residential capacity with overdevelopment of HMOs - Additional storey would appear overbearing and overshadow with a harmful impact on outlook - Detrimental to the appearance and character of the area - Concerns on waste disposal arrangements - Question rights of access to the building involving the courtyard of Wessex Court - Impact the historical design - Drainage concerns - Harm the balance…”
Officer report
Members considered the application
Members asked questions and debated the application after being told that the roof would use slate and condition wording would be updated.
“The application was introduced. Members were referred to the Update Sheet which set out in full the following:”
“(i) Clarification on proposed materials. The roof to be replaced with slate, not standing seam.”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
The committee granted permission subject to the conditions and informatives, including requirements for materials, windows, doors and structural works.
“The committee agreed to grant permission for the reasons and subject to the conditions and informatives set out in the Report and the Update Sheet.”
Minutes
Sources
- Winchester Planning Committee minutes, 15 April 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Winchester's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Winchester Planning Committee
- Council
- Winchester
- Date
- Wednesday 15 April 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Winchester committee decisions →
This committee's year
29 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.