Balcony and window amendments at 2 Frenchfield Way, Penrith

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Westmorland And Furness Eden Local Area Planning Committee on 25 Feb 2026.

2025/2415/FPAApproved

What was proposed

The application sought design changes to an approved extension, including revised windows, rooflight, balcony lighting, privacy screening and corner detailing.

“The proposed amendments include the widening of the first-floor bedroom window on the west elevation, the removal of one ground floor kitchen/dining window on the west elevation, the widening of a first-floor bathroom window on the north elevation, the omission of one rooflight from the rear roof slope, the addition of floor lights within the balcony area, a revised obscure glazed privacy screen on the west side of the first- floor balcony, and the introduction of…”

“One neighbour has objected to the revised proposal, raising concerns regarding overlooking from the widened west-facing bedroom window and from the first-floor balcony. Reference is made to a perceived reduction in privacy and to the cumulative visual impact of the changes.”

Officer report

Earlier permissions

Earlier permissions approved extensions and alterations to the dwelling, including the two-storey extension and first-floor balcony.

“Application Ref: 22/0316 Proposal: Proposed two storey and single storey extensions to dwelling. Decision: Approved with Conditions Decision Date: 29/07/2022”

“Application Ref: 2024/2318/FPA Proposal: Alterations and extensions. Decision: Approved with Conditions Decision Date: 17/02/2025”

Officer report

Officers recommended approval

Officers considered the amendments minor, appropriate in scale and character, and unlikely to create new or materially greater impacts than the approved scheme.

“The proposal has been assessed against the relevant policies of the development plan, including Policy DEV5 of the Eden Local Plan (2014–2032), which requires new development to demonstrate a clear understanding of the form and character of the area and to ensure that the amenity of neighbouring occupiers is not unreasonably affected.”

“On balance, the proposed amendments are minor in nature and do not give rise to any new or materially greater impacts than the approved scheme. The design remains appropriate in scale and character, and the separation distances ensure that neighbour privacy is preserved. The revised proposal is considered acceptable in accordance with the relevant policies of the development plan and is therefore recommended for approval. Recommendation…”

Officer report

Neighbour concerns

One neighbour objected to possible overlooking from the widened bedroom window and future balcony, citing reduced privacy and photographs showing views toward the enlarged window.

“Neighbour Responses: objection. One neighbour representation has been received in relation to this application. The neighbouring occupier has raised concern about actual and potential overlooking from the first-floor bedroom window and the future balcony, both of which face towards their own property. The comment includes photographs taken from inside a first-floor bedroom, showing a direct view of the applicant’s enlarged window currently under construction.”

“Officer Note: The representation expresses apprehension that the increased size of the west-facing window will result in additional loss of privacy and that the future balcony may exacerbate this impact once constructed.”

Officer report

Committee discussion

Questions and comments focused on privacy, and the planning officer said the nearest neighbour was over 29 metres away with no officer-identified privacy concerns.

“The application had been brought to the attention of the Committee due to an objection received from Penrith Town Council. The Town Council had objected to the potential loss of privacy for neighbouring properties.”

“Following a question from Cllr C Atkinson and comment from Cllr A Connell, the Planning Officer indicated that the nearest neighbour was over 29m away and that there were no privacy concerns noted by officers.”

Minutes

The committee voted

The recommendation was proposed, seconded and agreed unanimously.

“The recommendation was proposed and seconded and unanimously;”

“RESOLVED, that planning permission be GRANTED, subject to the following conditions:”

Minutes

Permission was granted

Planning permission was granted subject to conditions covering commencement, approved plans, materials and obscure-glazed balcony privacy screens.

“The obscure-glazed privacy screens on the west and east side of the balcony, as shown on the approved Drawings 124-114-08 (Proposed Plan and Elevations, Rev B, dated 10/02/2026) and 124-114-07 (Proposed Plan and Elevations, Rev B, dated 10/02/2026), shall be installed prior to the first use of the balcony. The screens shall be retained and maintained in their approved form for the lifetime of the development.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Westmorland And Furness Eden Local Area Planning Committee minutes, 25 February 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Westmorland And Furness's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 25 February 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

9 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →