Single garage and parking space at Tram Lane, Kirkby Lonsdale, Carnforth

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Westmorland And Furness South Lakeland Local Area Planning Committee on 18 Dec 2025.

2025/1069/FPAApproved

What was proposed

Permission was sought for a detached garage and parking space associated with an approved dwelling.

“SUMMARY 1.1 The application seeks full planning permission for the creation of a single garage & parking space in association with the planning approval SL/2022/0259, which granted permission for ‘erection of a single dwelling and creation of new vehicular access from A65 with associated works (resubmission of SL/2021/0445)’. RECOMMENDATION”

“The application seeks planning permission for a detached garage and parking space, to be used in association with the dwelling approved under planning application reference SL/2022/0259.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The cleared site is within the development boundary, beside the Conservation Area, and would be accessed from Bentick Drive.

“The application site relates to a long thin section of land located to the south-east of Kirkby Lonsdale. Currently the site has been cleared. Residential development has been approved on the wider site.”

“The application site is located within the Kirkby Lonsdale Development Boundary and adjacent to the Conservation Area.”

Officer report

Earlier permissions and site history

The dwelling permission followed an earlier refusal, while a drainage application remains undetermined and the garage location changed after flooding issues.

“Application Ref: SL/2021/0065 Proposal: Refurbishment and creation of a first floor to the existing bungalow including the demolition of 2 extensions and a concrete garage & erection of 2 new dwellings with access from Tram Lane and a single garage Decision: Approved with Conditions Decision Date: 29/03/2021”

“Application Ref: SL/2023/0175 Proposal: Discharge of Conditions 4 (method statement), 6 (noise), 9 (surface water drainage) & 11 (materials) attached to planning permission SL/2021/0065 Decision: Discharge of Conditions Decision Date: 03/11/2023”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval, finding the proposal acceptable in principle, design, heritage, residential amenity, drainage, trees and biodiversity terms.

“The main planning issues for this planning application are as follows: - the principle of development; - visual amenity impact; - residential amenity impact; - flood risk & drainage impact.”

“In terms of noise impacts and potential harm caused through vehicular activity in close proximity to the boundary, the garage is proposed for residential purposes, this is a primarily residential area and it is not considered that use of the garage for purposes ancillary to residential use of the new dwelling shall cause harmful neighbouring amenity impacts.”

Officer report

Objections from neighbours

Five objections raised concerns about flooding, plans, neighbouring amenity, trees, construction, maintenance, boundaries and the garage’s height and position.

“REPRESENTATIONS 6.1 5 letters of objections have been received and a summary of the concerns are listed below: • Harmful impact on drainage and flood risk; • Inaccuracy of plans and submitted documents - misleading; • Harmful impact on neighbouring amenity including; o Loss of light to gardens and outdoor areas o Too close to boundary wall for essential maintenance o Overbearing o Introduce potential noise, light spill and disruption from vehicle activity • Harmful…”

“Height of the garage should be reduced to lower than that of the Garden Cottage boundary wall at 3.5 metres. • No logical reason why a garage would need to be this tall unless they were hoping to apply for change of use in the future to convert it to a small house; • Alternatively, the applicant should be required to: o Relocate the garage further from neighbouring boundaries; o Provide an independently verified drainage strategy with no flood risk to neighbouring land; o…”

Officer report

The committee discussion

Members visited the site, considered photographs and plans, asked no questions, and received clarification that occupation depended on completed flood works.

“Members’ attention was drawn to a site plan, photographs of the surrounding area and the site and an aerial view of the site. It was noted that despite the site being in Flood Zone 1, some flooding issues had occurred on site surrounding the existing properties and that drainage works had been proposed at the rear of the proposed garage and parking space.”

“Following a query regarding the flood works, the Senior Planning Officer explained that Condition 3 provided that the property could not be occupied until the flood works had been completed.”

Minutes

The decision

The committee voted to grant planning permission with conditions covering commencement, approved plans, drainage, materials and biodiversity gain.

“Condition (3a) The development shall not be occupied until the drainage works have been completed on site in accordance with the approved plans, which includes ‘Drainage Layout’ ‘Proposed Single Garage’ as received 27th August 2025. Condition (3b) The approved works shall be retained as such thereafter.”

“Condition (5) The development may not be begun unless: a) a biodiversity gain plan has been submitted to the planning authority; and b) the planning authority has approved the plan.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Westmorland And Furness South Lakeland Local Area Planning Committee minutes, 18 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Westmorland And Furness's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Thursday 18 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

16 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →