Up to nine homes at Land At The Junction With Back Lane, Sandy Lane, Newburgh

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by West Lancashire Planning Committee on 15 Jan 2026.

2025/0883/PIPRefusedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

Permission in principle was sought for up to nine dwellings, with detailed design, access, landscaping and environmental matters left to a later stage.

“The permission in principle consent route is an alternative way of obtaining planning permission for housing-led development which separates the consideration of matters of principle for proposed development from the technical detail of the development.”

“Planning in principle is sought for the erection of up to 9 no. dwellings. All details relating to the external appearance, design, access, landscaping, siting and other technical / environmental matters are not relevant to the current PIP application and will be dealt with by a second planning application for approval of technical details under a Technical Details Consent.”

Officer report

The site

The site is at the junction of Sandy Lane and Back Lane, lies in the Green Belt and has no existing access.

“The application site relates to land at the junction where Back Lane meets Sandy Lane. There is no existing access to the site.”

“The site is located within the designated Green Belt boundaries as defined in the Local Plan.”

Officer report

Earlier application

An earlier application for a pair of semi-detached farm workers’ houses was refused.

“2004/0990 Erection of one pair of semi-detached houses for farm workers. Refused…”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval, considering the site grey belt land, housing need, sustainable location and potential for safe access.

“Grey belt land is defined as land in the Green Belt, comprising previously land and/or any other land that, in either case, does not strongly contribute to certain purposes (a, b and d) of the Green Belt identified in paragraph 143 of the NPPF. 'Grey Belt' excludes land where the application of the policies relating to the areas or assets in footnote 7 (other than Green Belt) would provide a strong reason for refusing or restricting development.”

“In addition to the above assessment, the definition of grey belt excludes land where the application of the policies relating to the areas or assets in footnote 7 (other than Green Belt). Footnote 7 includes land with flood risk. Mapping shows that the site is within flood zone 1 and is not within a location subject to the climate change scenario.”

Officer report

What consultees said

Highways, drainage and environmental protection raised no objection in principle, while requesting detailed investigations and design information at the next stage.

“Drainage Engineer (06/11/2025) - I have no objections to the proposed development at this location in principle subject to a satisfactory FRA and Drainage Strategy will be submitted for further comments at the detailed design (next stage) planning application submission…”

Officer report

Objections received

Neighbouring residents and the parish council objected over Green Belt impact, sustainability, land loss, flooding, highways, heritage, ecology and local services.

“The application received several letters from neighbouring residents, as well as Newburgh Parish Council, objecting to the application, raising concerns including;”

“Errors and queries regarding the Application • Impact on the Green Belt and the precedent for future development • Unsustainable Location • Loss of agricultural land • Historic and Archaeology Impact • Impact on the Conservation Area • Flood risk and lack of assessment or drainage strategy • Impact on highway safety, parking and traffic • Impact on Environmental Health (Noise, Air, etc.) • Impact on Ecology • Lack of information (technical details)”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee refused the application against the officer recommendation on Green Belt grounds because very special circumstances were absent.

“The Assistant Director of Planning and Regulatory Services submitted a report on planning application 2025/0883/PIP, relating to Land at the junction of Sandy Lane and Back Lane, Newburgh.”

“RESOLVED: That planning application 2025/0883/PIP be refused against officer recommendation, on Green Belt grounds in absence of very special circumstances. Wording to be agreed with Councillors Fowler and Pope.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The members' reasons are quoted from the minutes above, under “The committee’s decision”.

Sources

  • West Lancashire Planning Committee minutes, 15 January 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of West Lancashire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Thursday 15 January 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Refused, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

24 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →