B8 storage and distribution at Land Adjacent To 155 Southport New Road, Tarleton, Preston
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by West Lancashire Planning Committee on 20 Nov 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought changes to conditions controlling B8 use, noise, forklift trucks and external storage, with one proposed removal withdrawn.
“Removal of Condition 8 (withdrawn during determination), which originally sought to allow diesel forklift trucks in place of electric models.”
“Removal of Condition 9, which prohibits external storage, to permit outdoor storage of piling materials associated with the site’s current operations.”
Officer report
The site and its setting
The previously developed site has a long-standing haulage, storage and distribution use beside homes and fields in the Green Belt.
“The application site comprises a previously developed (brownfield) parcel of land located adjacent to 151–155 Southport New Road (A565), Tarleton. The site forms part of the ‘Front Land’ identified in the planning history and has a long-standing commercial use, historically as a haulage yard and more recently for storage and distribution under Use Class B8.”
“The land contains remnants of built structures and areas of hardstanding. It is bounded by agricultural fields and residential properties and lies within a semi-rural setting designated as Green Belt in the West Lancashire Local Plan.”
Officer report
Earlier permissions
Earlier permissions established the haulage yard and agricultural storage use, while later glasshouse permissions excluded the Front Land.
“8/90/223 – Retention of parking area for commercial vehicles and staff cars. This established the historic haulage yard use on the Front Land (Sui Generis).”
“2001/0795 – Full planning permission granted for the change of use of the Front Land to the storage and distribution of agricultural produce, including erection of a storage building and provision of car parking spaces. Use restricted to agricultural produce under Use Class B8.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the proposal would not harm Green Belt openness and could control noise, traffic and residential impacts through conditions.
“The application seeks to vary conditions associated with an existing lawful haulage yard use at land adjacent 155 Southport New Road, a site with a complex planning history and designation as previously developed land within the Green Belt. The proposal does not involve new built development and is considered to have no greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing use.”
“The applicant has demonstrated a willingness to address amenity concerns through the submission of a Noise Impact Assessment and the proposed installation of an acoustic fence. Environmental Health has reviewed the technical findings and recommended conditions to ensure noise levels are appropriately controlled, including a modern noise control standard to ensure site noise remains within strict limits compared to normal background levels.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Highways raised no objection subject to on-site servicing, while Environmental Health sought noise controls and continued electric forklift use.
“Lancashire County Council Highways (12/09/2025) – No objection, subject to the following condition: “No deliveries, collections or servicing shall take place directly from the public highway. All such activities must be undertaken within the curtilage of the site.”
“WLBC Environmental Protection – Environmental Health (01/10/2025) – No objection in principle to the variation of B8 use restrictions, provided neighbouring properties do not suffer adverse noise impacts.”
Officer report
Objections raised
One objection challenged the Green Belt use and raised concerns about enforcement, noise, privacy, landscaping, access, traffic, hours and waste.
“Amenity Impacts: The objector reports significant disturbance from early morning operations (from 6:30am), including noise from HGVs, forklift trucks, and pile handling. Concerns are also raised about loss of privacy due to overlooking from the yard into bedroom windows, resulting in sleep disturbance and a reduction in residential amenity.”
“Noise and landscaping: Concerns are expressed regarding the adequacy of the proposed acoustic fencing and the absence of landscaping, which was conditioned under the original 2001 permission but allegedly not implemented. The removal of conifer trees planted by the objector is said to have exacerbated noise and privacy issues.”
Officer report
The committee decision
The committee approved the application subject to conditions and added requirements covering landscaping, surfacing, parking and vehicle manoeuvring.
“A. That planning application 2025/0728/FUL be approved, subject to conditions, as set out at paragraph 12.”
“B. That additional conditions be imposed on the application to address landscaping, improved surfacing, and provision of adequate space for the parking and manoeuvring of vehicles. The final wording of these conditions shall be agreed in consultation with the Chairperson and Councillor E Pope.”
Minutes
Sources
- West Lancashire Planning Committee minutes, 20 November 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of West Lancashire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- West Lancashire Planning Committee
- Council
- West Lancashire
- Date
- Thursday 20 November 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- West Lancashire committee decisions →
This committee's year
22 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.