Up to four homes at Land North West Of Heathey Lane, Shirdley Hill, Halsall
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by West Lancashire Planning Committee on 20 Nov 2025.
What was proposed
Permission in principle was sought for up to four homes, with detailed design and layout left for a later technical details stage.
“The permission in principle consent route is an alternative way of obtaining planning permission for housing-led development which separates the consideration of matters of principle for proposed development from the technical detail of the development.”
“Planning in principle is sought for the residential development of up to four dwellings. All details relating to the external appearance, design, access, landscaping, siting and other technical / environmental matters are not relevant to the current PIP application and will be dealt with by a second planning application for approval of technical details under a Technical Details Consent.”
Officer report
The site
The site is Green Belt land outside Shirdley Hill’s settlement boundary, beside an established ribbon of mainly bungalow development along Heathey Lane.
“The site comprises of Green Belt land located to the northwest of Heathey Lane, Shirdley Hill, Halsall.”
“The site lies outside the settlement boundary of Shirdley Hill. It is located along Heathey Lane, where an established ribbon of development, comprising primarily bungalows fronting the road, extends outward from the settlement.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended permission because they considered the proposal limited infilling, Grey Belt development and sustainable housing that would meet local need.
“The Council can currently demonstrate only a 1.86-year housing land supply, confirming a demonstrable unmet need for housing. • The proposal is not major development, comprising up to 4 dwellings on a 0.4- hectare site (below the 0.5-hectare threshold). • The site is visually contained, adjacent to existing development, and not constrained by national designations (SSSI, AONB, flood risk).”
“In conclusion, the proposal meets the relevant criteria under paragraph 155 of the NPPF and should not be regarded as inappropriate development in the Green Belt. The site’s limited strategic contribution, its classification as Grey Belt, and the demonstrable housing need support the principle of development in this location.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
The committee refused the application, contrary to the officer recommendation, citing harm to the Green Belt, no Very Special Circumstances and harm to Grade 1 agricultural land.
“The Assistant Director of Planning & Regulatory Services submitted a report on planning application 2025/0584/PIP, relating to Land North West Of, Heathey Lane, Shirdley Hill, L39 8SH.”
“RESOLVED: That planning application 2025/0584/PIP be refused, contrary to the Officer’s recommendation, on the grounds of harm to the Green Belt, absence of Very Special Circumstances, and adverse impact on Grade 1 agricultural land. The precise wording of the refusal reasons shall be agreed in consultation with the Chairperson.”
Minutes
Sources
- West Lancashire Planning Committee minutes, 20 November 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of West Lancashire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- West Lancashire Planning Committee
- Council
- West Lancashire
- Date
- Thursday 20 November 2025
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- West Lancashire committee decisions →
This committee's year
22 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.