House extensions and annexe at The White House, Tilford Road, Hindhead
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Waverley Planning Committee on 6 Aug 2025.
What was proposed
The application proposed house extensions, alterations, a detached double garage and an ancillary annexe with dormer windows.
“The application seeks planning permission for the erection of a single storey extension to the north and wrapping to the east of the house, following the demolition of the existing single storey projection to the east. A single storey extension is proposed to the south of the house to provide a store. A detached double garage/annexe building is proposed on land towards the front of the site, adjacent to the southern site boundary.”
“A detached double garage/annexe building is proposed on land towards the front of the site, adjacent to the southern site boundary.”
Officer report
The site
The property is a detached house behind a dental clinic, served by a private driveway also used by nearby homes.
“The application site is located to the west of Tilford Road, Hindhead. The house itself is set behind Hindhead Dental Clinic.”
“The property is a 2.5 storey, detached, house with single storey projection to the east. It has cream rendered walls and a clay tile roof.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
Earlier applications included a withdrawn dwelling proposal and permissions for retirement flats, parking, access and works serving Tennyson Court.
“WA/2006/2401 Revised car parking layout for 18 cars and the erection of bin store and cycle store building to serve 12 retirement flats (permitted under WA/2005/2249) (re Tennyson Court flats)”
“GRANTED 11/12/2006 WA/2005/2249 Erection of 3 two storey buildings to provide 12 retirement flats, associated parking, access road and landscaping (revision of WA/2005/1132) (Tennyson Court flats)”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval subject to conditions, concluding the proposals were acceptable in scale, appearance and impact on neighbours, trees and highways.
“RECOMMENDATION That, subject to conditions, permission be GRANTED”
“It is considered that the proposals would fully accord with the Development Plan, being of an acceptable scale, height, form and appearance. The proposals would not result in harm to the character of the host dwellinghouse or the street scene, the amenities of neighbouring occupiers or the long term health of the trees the subject of a Tree Preservation Order.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The town council and consultees raised no objection, with highways and trees subject to conditions and informatives.
“No objection subject to condition and informatives WBC CIL Team Potentially CIL Liable…”
“WBC Tree Officer No objection subject to conditions and informative…”
Officer report
What residents said
Twenty-one letters objected over highway safety, construction traffic, possible separate use, overdevelopment, character, overlooking, privacy and tree removal.
“- Electricity substation additional problem/obstacle, not mentioned/or on plans - Garage could be converted into single bedroom rental flat/house or office in future - Application appears to be prelude to further expansion of use, provision of separate use and subsequent sale - Location and access limitations make actual application (let alone further development) unacceptable - If approved could set precedent for building to be converted into an independent flat or officer…”
“- Mottram currently overlooked by first floor windows in The White House and removal of hedge G7 will result in further loss of privacy, overlooked by more first floor/second floor windows and terrace over proposed store - Terrace, whilst removed by amended plans, could be reinstated in future as plans still include full length windows which appear to be fully opening.”
Officer report
Public speakers
No public speakers registered to make representations on the application.
The committee vote
After debating the application, twelve members voted for the officers’ recommendation, with none against and no abstentions.
“Following the debate, the Committee voted in favour of the officers’ recommendation to grant permission twelve in favour, none against and no abstentions.”
Minutes
The decision
Permission was granted subject to conditions 1 to 10 and informatives 1 to 9.
“Subject to conditions 1-10 and Informatives 1-9, permission was GRANTED”
Minutes
Sources
- Waverley Planning Committee minutes, 6 August 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Waverley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Waverley Planning Committee
- Council
- Waverley
- Date
- Wednesday 6 August 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 12 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Waverley committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
11 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.