330 homes at Land at Thelwall Heyes (bounded by Trans Pennine Trail to the North, Pickerings Bridge to the East, Knutsford Road

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Warrington Development Management Committee on 15 Jan 2026.

2025/00444/FULMApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed 330 homes, including 99 affordable homes, with new accesses, open space, play areas, landscaping, drainage and related works.

“2025/00444/FULM Description of Development: Construction of 330 dwellings (including 99 affordable homes), new vehicular and pedestrian accesses off Cliff Lane, public open space including equipped play, landscaping, highways works, foul and surface water drainage infrastructure and associated ancillary works…”

“Location Address: Land at Thelwall Heyes (bounded by Trans Pennine Trail to the North, Pickerings Bridge to the East, Knutsford Road, Cliff Lane, and Bridgewater Canal to the south, and Stockport Road to West)”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The 20.7-hectare site was mainly agricultural land with trees, hedgerows, brooks, ponds and heritage assets around its boundaries and centre.

“The application site is 20.7Ha and currently used predominantly for arable farming / agricultural uses. Across the site, there are several field boundaries most of which are organic principally defined by existing trees / hedgerows / brooks. To the west, Marsh Brook / Thelwall Heys Brook run through the site. There are also areas of significant established landscaping features, particularly along Thelwall Heys Brook and around several ponds.”

“Centrally, the application site wraps around Thelwall Heys (plus gardens and curtilage buildings), this is an aesthetic grade II listed building accessed via a narrow-extended driveway from Cliff Lane, both of which are located outside of the application site. To the north, the site boundary predominantly consists of the A56 Stockport Road / Trans Pennine Trail and 2 dwellings; the A56 defines the northwest corner and is elevated in parts above the application site.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended permission because the development could meet housing needs and policy requirements without significant adverse impacts, subject to conditions and a legal obligation.

“Recommendation: Grant subject to conditions and a s106 obligation with delegated authority given to the Development Manager to make non-material changes to planning conditions and reasons as may be necessary prior to the issue of the decision…”

“The proposed development would meet the general and specialised housing needs as identified in the Housing Needs Strategy; including providing 30% affordable housing, accessible adaptable homes and 3No. self-build plots.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Council services and other consultees generally raised no objection in principle, subject to conditions, contributions and further details, while active travel requested improvements.

“Warrington BC Conservation – No objection in principle, the development proposed respects the setting of Thelwall Heys. The proposed bridge over the brook can be conditioned for details to be agreed. Warrington BC Travel Plan – No objection in principle subject to appropriate travel plan provision; to be provided by the Council.”

“Active travel – Objection raised, further information required to support travel plan, increased cycle provision and active travel audit.”

Officer report

What people said

Objections concerned Green Belt loss, traffic, access, flooding, ecology, infrastructure, local character, residential amenity and heritage impacts.

“Thelwall Heys is designated Green Belt, its development contradicts the purposes of that designation: preventing urban sprawl, preserving openness, and protecting the rural character of the area. “Exceptional circumstances” have not been demonstrated. • Housing targets alone do not constitute such justification, especially when alternative brownfield sites remain available within the borough.”

“Fundamental incompatibility between the scale of the development and the limitations of the local road network. Concerns regarding congestion and road/ pedestrian safety • Reliance on narrow Cliff Lane a single point of access with no alternate egress conflicts with planning policy, it is unsuitable for high traffic volumes and would impact on emergency services.”

Officer report

The committee decision

The committee approved the application with conditions in line with the officer recommendation, subject to expiration or revocation of the holding directive.

“The Director of Place submitted the above application with a recommendation to grant permission subject to conditions and S106 obligation.”

“The application was approved with conditions as per officer recommendations, subject to expiration/ revocation of the holding directive.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Warrington Development Management Committee minutes, 15 January 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Warrington's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Warrington
Date
Thursday 15 January 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

23 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →