Bin store and utility buildings at Green Energy Hub Chesterford Park, Little Chesterford

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Uttlesford Planning Committee on 17 Dec 2025.

UTT/25/2525/FULApproved

The meeting was recorded; the recording is on the council's website.

What was proposed

The application sought a bin store, landscaping and tree planting, plus retrospective permission for a fibre building and GRP equipment enclosures.

“PROPOSAL: Proposed installation of bin store, together with related landscaping, tree planting and associated development. Section 73A retrospective application for a new fibre building, and GRP equipment enclosures.”

“The applicant seeks planning permission for the installation of a bin store, landscaping and associated development. The applicant also seeks retrospective planning permission for a new fibre building and ‘glass reinforced plastic’ (GRP) equipment enclosures.”

Officer report

The site

The site is within Chesterford Research Park, which contains research and development buildings and lies in the countryside near Bassingbourne Wood.

“The application sites are located within Chesterford Research Park, which lies to the east of Little Chesterford. The site comprises of a range of buildings for research and development purposes, as well as associated ancillary buildings and infrastructure. The application sites are split into four parcels of land.”

“The Chesterford Research Park is located within the countryside, with few residential dwellings in the vicinity. Bassingbourne Wood is located to the north of the Research Park.”

Officer report

Earlier permission

An earlier application for a Green Energy Hub, including solar arrays, battery storage and associated infrastructure, was approved in 2022.

“Reference Proposal Decision UTT/21/2846/FUL The construction of a Green Energy Hub for the Chesterford Research Park comprising solar array Approved (2022)”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the proposal was appropriate in principle and design and would not harm residential amenities, access, parking or ecology.

“The proposal is appropriate with respect to its principle and design and appearance. The proposal would not result in detrimental harm to the amenities enjoyed by residential dwellings, to access and parking or to ecology.”

“The proposal has been assessed against the relevant policies contained within the Development Plan, relevant legislation and the National Planning Policy Framework. The Officer concludes that the proposal complies and is in accordance with these policies and guidance. As such, the proposal is recommended for approval subject to conditions.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Environmental Health anticipated no significant impacts, the Landscape Officer accepted the limited tree impacts, and ecology raised no objection subject to conditions.

“The Environmental Health Officer reported that they did not anticipate any significant environmental health or public health impacts associated with the proposed development, as the size, scale and location of the proposal means that any noise impact is likely to be minimal.”

“The Landscape Officer reported that while the felling of trees (as proposed) should generally be avoided, the impacts are limited and acceptable. The Landscape Officer highlighted the positive outcome from the Design and Access Statement that replacement trees will be planted.”

Officer report

Public representations

Two site notices and 68 notification letters were issued, but no representations had been received.

“Two site notices were displayed on site and 68 notifications letters were sent to nearby properties, including one set of re-consultations following the establishment that the proposal is part-retrospective. At the time of writing this report, no representations have been received.”

Officer report

Members’ discussion

In response to Members’ questions, officers said other bins contained equipment that was not considered to significantly affect residential amenities.

“In response to questions from Members, officers confirmed that other bins contained equipment that was not seen as having a significant impact on residential amenities.”

Minutes

The vote

Approval was proposed and seconded, and the committee authorised permission subject to the conditions in section 17.

“Councillor Freeman proposed approval of the application, and this was seconded by Councillor Emanuel.”

“RESOLVED that the Strategic Director of Planning be authorised to grant permission for the development subject to those items set out in section 17 of the report- A) Conditions.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Uttlesford Planning Committee minutes, 17 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Uttlesford's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Uttlesford
Date
Wednesday 17 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Recording
On the council's website
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

32 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →