68-home apartment development at B&M, 1-5 Broad Road, Sale

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Trafford Planning and Development Management Committee on 11 Jun 2026.

117693/OUT/25Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed demolishing the existing retail building and erecting up to 68 apartments, with access, layout and scale considered at outline stage.

“Outline planning application for the demolition of the existing building and erection of residential development of up to 68 dwellings with all matters reserved except for access, layout and scale…”

“The application relates to the existing B&M retail site within Sale town centre with the proposal seeking demolition of the existing building and redevelopment for up to 68 dwellings (a combination of 1 and 2 bedroom apartments). This is an outline application considering access, layout and scale only with all other matters reserved (appearance and landscaping).”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is a B&M building with parking and servicing areas in Sale town centre, near a nursery, education facility, heritage assets and residential areas.

“The application relates to a parcel of land located on the northern side of Broad Road, Sale. The site comprises a large detached two storey building currently occupied by retailer B&M with associated car parking and servicing areas accessed from both Broad Road and Wharf Road.”

“The site is located within the boundary of Sale Town Centre which also includes Sale Leisure Centre sitting on the opposite side of Broad Road and the Q Park multi storey car park and apartments to the northwest of the application site. Immediately to the rear of the application site is a children’s day nursery. There is also an educational institution (Keane Futures Ltd) on the opposite side of Broad Road.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the town-centre housing scheme complied with the development plan overall and its benefits outweighed its identified harms.

“Identified harms relate to the failure to provide a policy compliant mix of housing types and sizes and the proposed parking shortfall. Nevertheless, these have been addressed within the above report and are not considered to be harms that would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the scheme.”

“Substantial weight is given to the contribution the scheme would make to the Borough’s housing land supply and delivery. The exercise under the tilted balance has been carried out, and the harms arising from the proposal are considered to be outweighed by the benefits when tested against NPPF Paragraph 11(d)(ii).”

Officer report

What residents said

Ten letters objected over retail loss, traffic, parking, infrastructure, litter, environmental effects and overlooking, while one letter supported the design in principle.

“Principle - Supports the principle of residential development in this sustainable location; - Premature given that plans to redevelop Sale Leisure Centre have not been shared or made public; - The loss of a retail store in this location will be a loss to Sale; - No general objection to the introduction of apartments in this highly-sustainable location.”

“Highways and Parking - Increase in traffic volume; - Increased congestion; - Reduced visibility; - Increased risk of accidents; - Concerns regarding children, parents and staff at Keane Futures Ltd, an educational institution on the opposite side of Broad Road; - Serious and unacceptable traffic safety risks; - Insufficient access and infrastructure – emergency vehicles, school transport and local services may face increased difficulty navigating the area, which raises wider…”

Officer report

The committee decision

Members were minded to grant permission, deferring and delegating determination subject to completing a legal agreement and meeting the stated conditions.

“RESOLVED: That Members are minded to grant planning permission for the development and that the determination of the application hereafter be deferred and delegated to the Head of Planning and Development as follows:-”

“(iv) That upon the satisfactory completion of the above Legal Agreement that planning permission be granted subject to the conditions now determined (unless amended by (ii) above).”

Minutes

The required contributions

The legal agreement was to secure affordable housing, public open space, education funding and a Local Labour Agreement.

“(i) To complete a suitable Legal Agreement / Unilateral Undertaking to secure:”

“Public Open Space contribution of £37,107.07 broken down as follows: o Open Space contribution £16,643.77 o Children/young people (play contribution) £20,463.30”

Minutes

Sources

  • Trafford Planning and Development Management Committee minutes, 11 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Trafford's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Trafford
Date
Thursday 11 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

42 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →