Garden nursery and storage at Land At Clay Lane Nurseries Clay Lane/Thorley Lane, Timperley

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Trafford Planning and Development Management Committee on 22 Jan 2026.

116856/FUL/25Approved

What was proposed

The application sought to regularise garden nursery, builders storage and scaffolding storage, including five shipping containers.

“Application for change of use of land from Garden Nursery to a mixed use of Garden Nursery, builder's storage and scaffolding storage (sui generis), with associated 5 no. shipping container storage units.”

Officer report

The site today

The site is an L-shaped nursery plot with glasshouses, a polytunnel, containers, hardstanding, planting and two access points.

“The site refers to an L-shaped plot, to the east of Thorley Lane that has historically been used for a Garden Nursery. It includes two glasshouse buildings, a polytunnel and 5no shipping containers. Roughly half of the plot is open hardstanding/low level shrubs.”

“The application site is located on the east side of Thorley Lane and historically has been used as a garden nursery. Approximately half the site is open land, and the other built form, consisting of two large, detached glasshouses, a polytunnel structure and 5 storage containers.”

Officer report

Earlier uses and applications

Airport car parking was previously refused or dismissed on appeal, and an enforcement notice required that use to cease.

“The site has previous been used for airport car parking, however an application for this as a permanent use of the site was refused, and an appeal dismissed in July 2020. An enforcement notice was then served to cease the airport car parking use by March 2021. This use has now ceased.”

Officer report

Noise and residential amenity

Officers considered the storage uses would not cause undue residential harm, with controlled access hours for scaffolding activity.

“Noise/disturbance regarding the builder’s storage is not considered to be materially different in profile of the garden nursery use. The proposed area for this use this is also set away from the residential property. However, the scaffolding storage use is sited closer to the residential property and is considered to have a more unique profile.”

“In conclusion, it’s considered that the proposed mix of uses on site would not result in undue harm to residential amenity, subject to the conditions proposed. The proposed storage uses in addition to the established and lawful garden nursery use are considered to have similar characteristics that would not result in a level in intensification of site use that would result in an unacceptable impact on residential amenity and therefore the proposed is considered compliant…”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The highways authority raised no objection, while environmental protection requested restricted hours and a noise management plan.

“Local Highways Agency - No objections on highway grounds to the proposals.”

“Environmental Protection (Nuisance) – Recommends hours of use for the builders store/scaffolding element between 08.00 and 16.00 (referencing the submitted documents), Monday to Friday, and submission of a noise management plan. REPRESENTATIONS”

Officer report

Objections and concerns

A neighbour objected about noise, commercial access, reversing difficulties and damage to driveway paving; councillors raised wider environmental and amenity concerns.

“An objection has been received from the occupants of 2 Clay Lane. The below is a summary of the points raised: - Noise of scaffolding being loaded/unloaded causes disturbance. - Single track access not suitable for commercial use. - Have to wait/reverse to access/egress from home as now passing place on track. - Trucks turning on drive causes damage to driveway paving.”

“Further to this, an objection and call-in request has been received from Cllr Evans and Butt. The below is a summary of the points raised: - Inappropriate to reference previous unauthorised use as a car park. - This application appears to attempt to circumvent the previous refusals/enforcement notices. - Inaccuracies in relation to previous uses of the site.”

Officer report

The committee debate

A motion to defer the application was proposed and seconded but was not carried.

“It was moved and seconded that determination of the application be deferred.”

“The motion was put to the vote and declared lost.”

Minutes

The decision

Permission was granted with the stated conditions, including amended scaffolding access hours and no use on bank holidays.

“RESOLVED: That planning permission be granted subject to the conditions now determined with an amendment to condition 4 as follows:-”

“(4) The areas for scaffolding storage as shown on CFI2516_PL03A shall only be accessed between the hours of 08:00-18:00 Monday-Friday, 08:00-16:00 Saturdays and Sundays, and no use on Bank Holidays.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Trafford Planning and Development Management Committee minutes, 22 January 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Trafford's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Trafford
Date
Thursday 22 January 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

33 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →