Library to fitness facility at Torridge District Council Town Hall, Bideford

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Torridge Plans Committee on 5 Mar 2026.

1/0971/2025/LBCApproved

What was proposed

The application sought to convert the library into a gym and fitness facility, with co-working spaces, repairs, accessibility works and other alterations.

“Proposed Development The application seeks Listed Building Consent for the following development:- • Change of use of the Library to a Gym and Fitness facility, including changing rooms and showers. • Internal alterations to the ground floor offices, reception and members lounge to create a series of Co-Working spaces, break-out spaces and managers office. • Replacement single-storey extension to the rear of the former Library building.”

“The application is supported by a twin Full Planning Application, reference: 1/0970/2025/LA.”

Officer report

The site and building

The site is a Grade II listed town hall and public library in Bideford’s conservation area, with active and vacant areas across several floors.

“The existing building currently has a mix of uses, which are as follows:- • The basement floor accommodates the main plant room. • The ground floor use of the building is largely vacant; however, was formerly used as a library, offices, reception and members lounge. • The first floor currently has an active use and accommodates the Town Council Chambers, lobby, Mayoral Parlour, robe room, kitchen and the former Magistrate Court, now used as Town Hall meeting room.”

“The site is neighboured by a number of designated heritage assets, including: • Bridge Buildings (list entry: 1206687), located immediately to the north of the site and is a Grade II heritage asset; • Bideford Bridge, including Parapet Walls and gates of east abutment (list entry: 1200873), located immediately to the east of the site and is a Grade I1 heritage asset; • Tantons Hotel (list entry: 1292476), located immediately to the south of the site and is a Grade II…”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the scheme would return the building to active community use, support restoration and accessibility, and outweigh limited heritage harm.

“By virtue of the proposed development bringing an active use into the building would allow for the financial reinvestment into the fabric of the heritage asset, allowing for its repair and restoration, preserving the heritage asset for future generations. Significant weight is afforded to restoration of the heritage asset.”

“Taking into consideration of the above, it is accepted that the scheme will cause a degree (less than substantial) of harm to the designated heritage asset, therefore it must be accepted that there is some conflict with Paragraph 212 of the National Planning Policy Framework, which attributes great weight to an assets conservation.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The conservation officer had no objection in principle, while environmental protection sought limits on construction hours to protect neighbouring residential amenity.

“Environmental Protection Officer: The following consultation response is provided by the Environmental Protection Team in relation to the above application.”

“The Environmental Protection Team has no objections in principle however, due to the presence and proximity of neighbouring dwellings, there is the potential for residential amenity to be adversely affected on a temporary basis from the construction works if control measures are not in place.”

Officer report

Public views

Bideford Town Council resolved not to approve the application, but no neighbour letters or other representations were received.

“Bideford Town Council: RESOLVED: That the application is not approved.”

“Number of neighbours consulted: Number of letters of support: Number of representations received: Number of neutral representations: Number of objection letters: 0”

Officer report

Members’ discussion

Members asked Town and Parish Councils to give reasons for their decisions so their statements could carry greater weight.

“Councillor Bushby proposed to approve the application. This was seconded by Councillor Kenneally.”

“Members asked that Town and Parish Councils be encouraged to provide reasons for their decisions to strengthen the weight of their statements.”

Minutes

The committee vote

Councillor Bushby’s proposal, seconded by Councillor Kenneally, was approved by eight votes, with one abstention.

“It was proposed by Councillor Bushby, seconded by Councillor Keneally that the application is approved.”

Minutes

The final decision

The application was approved subject to the conditions set out for the consent.

“That the application is approved, subject to the conditions detailed in the report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Torridge Plans Committee minutes, 5 March 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Torridge's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Torridge
Date
Thursday 5 March 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 6 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →