Sport and fitness facility at Torridge District Council Town Hall, Bideford
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Torridge Plans Committee on 4 Dec 2025.
What was proposed
The application proposed converting a library into a sport and fitness facility, with co-working spaces, building repairs, accessibility works, solar panels and heat pumps.
“The existing building currently has a mix of uses, which are as follows:- • The basement floor accommodates the main plant room. • The ground floor use of the building is largely vacant; however, was formerly used as a library, offices, reception and members lounge. • The first floor currently has an active use and accommodates the Town Council Chambers, lobby, Mayoral Parlour, robe room, kitchen and the former Magistrate Court, now used as Town Hall meeting room.”
“Proposed Development The application seeks full planning permission for the following development:- • Change of use of the Library to a Gym and Fitness facility, including changing rooms and showers. • Internal alterations to the ground floor offices, reception and members lounge to create a series of Co-Working spaces, break-out spaces and managers office. • Replacement single-storey extension to the rear of the former Library building.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
The building has a history of alterations, including listed building consents for access works, a plaque and internal alterations.
“1/1251/2002 INTERNAL ALTERATIONS TO BUILDING TO ENABLE INSTALLATION OF PLATFORM PASSENGER LIFT AND ALTERATIONS TO CREATE WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE TOILET PER 03.09.2002”
“1/1252/2002 Internal alterations to building to enable installation of platform passenger lift and alterations to create wheelchair accessible toilet PER 03.09.2002”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the harm to the heritage asset was less than substantial and outweighed by public benefits including reuse, repair and improved accessibility.
“The Council’s Conservation Officer has provided comments, which are provided earlier in this report. The Conservation Officer acknowledges that the visual distraction caused by the solar P.V. is considered to be limited and only experienced in a few locations and can be accommodated within wider views along the Quay and concludes that the harm is less than substantial. Consequently, the benefits of the scheme need to be weighed against the minor harm.”
“The Planning Officer concurs with the Conservation Officer's views and considers the harm arising from the scheme can be judged as less than substantial. In the opinion of your Officer, this limited harm is outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme, namely, reintroduces an active use into the predominantly vacant building; would enable the conservation and repair of the heritage asset; would improve the buildings energy load; would improve the accessibility of the…”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The town council recommended approval subject to conservation approval, while the conservation officer accepted the proposal subject to further details and conditions.
“Bideford Town Council: RESOLVED That: recommend approval subject to the Conservation Officer being satisfied with the application.”
“The proposal is considered to be acceptable subject to the receipt of these additional details and would be considered to accord with the guidance in paragraph 215 of the NPPF where the harm to the significance is considered to be less than substantial and this would leave the officer to evaluate the public benefit of the scheme.”
Officer report
Objections received
Two objections raised concerns about residential amenity, noise and vibration from the proposed air source heat pumps.
“Number of neighbours consulted: Number of letters of support: Number of representations received: Number of neutral representations: 0”
“The public representations received are summarised below: Objection Comment - Impact on residential amenity, as a result of the noise and vibration impacts from the proposed Air Source Heat Pumps (x 2).”
Officer report
Members’ discussion
Members discussed the listed building consent, the earlier planning application, internal and external works, and the improved fire-rated internal doors.
“Discussion: The Principal Planning Officer briefly presented the listed building consent application, noting its association with the previous planning application and covering internal and external works. Chair noted that public speakers were no longer present at the meeting and opened discussion up to Members. Members noted positive change regarding the internal doors (purpose-made, fire- rated).”
Minutes
The final decision
The committee refused the application because the proposed alterations would damage the listed building and conflict with heritage policies and the statutory preservation duty.
“It was proposed by Councillor Leather, seconded by Councillor Bushby and Resolved: That the application be refused due to harm to the listed building in conflict with Local Plan policies ST15 and DM07, and Section 16 of the NPPF A recorded vote was taken COUNCILLOR For Against Abstain…”
“(Vote: 5 for, 3 against, 1 abstention) Resolved – Refusal citing damage to the listed building by the proposed alterations, conflicting with policies ST15, DM07, NPPF Section 16, and the statutory duty to preserve the listed building. Speakers None present.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The members' reasons are quoted from the minutes above, under “The final decision”.
Sources
- Torridge Plans Committee minutes, 4 December 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Torridge's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Torridge Plans Committee
- Council
- Torridge
- Date
- Thursday 4 December 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Refused, against officer advice
- Vote
- 5 for refusal, 3 against, 1 abstained
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Torridge committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
8 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.