Replacement communal windows at Chelmer House And Post Office Land, Chadwell St Mary

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Thurrock Planning Committee on 10 Feb 2026.

25/01247/FULApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed replacing curtain walling with manually openable uPVC casement windows to improve ventilation in communal areas.

“This is a Thurrock Council full planning application seeking planning permission for the replacement of the curtain walling system on a block of flats known as 1 to 23 Chelmer House with uPVC casement units to provide improved ventilation to communal areas in line with the fire risk assessment.”

“This planning application seeks approval for the replacement of the curtain walling on the north and west elevation with uPVC casement units to provide improved ventilation to communal areas in line with the fire risk assessment. There are no proposed changes to any residential accommodation within the block.”

Officer report

The site

The site is a four-storey residential block with a courtyard and resident parking, in a mainly residential area near a shopping parade.

“The application site comprises a four-storey residential block of flats located at the corner of Chelmer Road and River View, positioned between the Chadwell St Mary shopping parade. The building has a distinctive C-shaped layout, a central courtyard and off-street parking for residents.”

“The application site is located just outside the designated shopping parade in River View, Chadwell St Mary. The surrounding area is predominantly residential in character, comprising a mix of medium- to low-rise housing developments.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the works addressed fire safety, preserved the building’s appearance and could protect neighbours through construction-hour controls.

“As existing the majority of the windows of the residential flats of the building are white double glazed uPVC windows. The proposed works will assure fire compliance while trying to minimise changes to appearance of the building. The proposed design and appearance of the application site is considered to blend in well with the existing window and façade treatment and overall would not harm the architectural character or visual amenity of the host building.”

“In conclusion, the proposed works are considered to be both necessary and proportionate, responding directly to fire safety requirements while keeping changes to the building’s appearance to a minimum. The replacement windows ensure that the overall look and character of the building is preserved. The scheme therefore respects the local setting and aligns with the aims of the NPPF and Core Strategy Policies CSTP22 and CSTP23.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Environmental Health recommended construction-hour restrictions, Building Control identified building-regulation requirements, and Essex Fire and Rescue comments were awaited when the report was drafted.

“The works as described in the application will be subject to Building Control approval. In particular, the works will need to be designed and constructed in compliance with parts B1& B5 of the Building Regulations 2010.”

“Comments awaited at time of drafting report.”

Officer report

Members’ questions

Members asked whether doorways would change and were told the proposal concerned windows only; they were also told Essex Fire Service had no objections.

“Members queried whether the doorways will be changed. It was confirmed that this was solely for windows and Essex Fire Service have no objections.”

“Members stated they were in in full agreement with the proposal.”

Minutes

The decision

The committee approved the recommendation to authorise the Chief Planning Officer to grant planning permission, subject to the stated reasons and conditions.

“That the Chief Planning Officer be authorised to GRANT planning permission for the development subject to those reasons set out in section 16 of the report.”

“For (8): Councillor Fletcher, Sisterson, Cherry, Green, Jones, Kelly, Panjala, Shinnick Against (0): Abstain (0):”

Minutes

Sources

  • Thurrock Planning Committee minutes, 10 February 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Thurrock's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Thurrock
Date
Tuesday 10 February 2026
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
8 for, 0 against
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

30 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →