Replacement communal windows at 9 - 51 Calcutta Road, Tilbury
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Thurrock Planning Committee on 10 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed replacing glass block windows with manually openable uPVC casement windows to improve ventilation in communal areas.
“This is a Thurrock Council full planning application seeks planning permission for the replacement of glass block windows on a block of flats known as 7-55 Calcutta Road Parade. The glass block windows would be replaced with uPVC casement units to provide improved ventilation to communal areas in line with the fire risk assessment.”
“PROPOSAL: Replacement of the thick glass brickwork windows on the rear elevation with uPVC casement units that will provide ventilation into the three communal areas where the self contained flats are located, as per recommendations in the fire risk assessment.”
Officer report
The site
The site is a three-storey block with commercial ground-floor units and residential flats above, within a shopping parade surrounded mainly by housing.
“The application site is a three-storey block with commercial units on ground floor and residential units on the upper floors situated south on Calcutta Road. The flats on the upper floors are accessed through three communal entrances.”
“The application site is located within a designated shopping parade in Tilbury Town Centre. The surrounding area is predominantly residential in character, comprising a mix of medium- to low-rise housing developments.”
Officer report
Planning history
There was no directly relevant planning history and no pre-application advice was given.
“There has been no pre-application advice given prior to the submission of this application.”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
Officers considered the works necessary for fire safety, visually acceptable, and acceptable for neighbouring amenity subject to construction-hour controls.
“The proposed works arise from a recent Fire Risk Assessment, which confirmed that the existing glass brickwork windows no longer comply with current fire safety requirements.”
“As existing the majority of the windows of the residential flats of the building are white double glazed uPVC windows. The proposed works will assure fire compliance while trying to minimise changes to appearance of the building. The proposed design and appearance of the application site is considered to blend in well with the existing window and façade treatment and overall would not harm the architectural character or visual amenity of the host building.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Environmental Health recommended construction-hour controls, Building Control highlighted approval and fire-safety requirements, and Fire and Rescue comments were awaited.
“Condition recommended restricting the hours of construction activities…”
“The works as described in the application will be subject to Building Control approval. In particular, the works will need to be designed and constructed in compliance with parts B1& B5 of the Building Regulations 2010.”
Officer report
Public representations
The application was advertised by neighbour letters and a nearby site notice, but no representations were received.
“The application was advertised via individual neighbour letter and a site notice was erected nearby. No representations have been received.”
Officer report
Committee discussion
Officers presented the proposal and explained the fire-safety shortcomings of the existing glass brickwork; there were no further questions or debate.
“Officers presented this item to committee. Members were advised that the application sought to remove the existing glass brickwork from the apertures on the building’s rear façade at three locations and install new, manually openable, double glazed uPVC casement windows. Members were advised the existing glass brickwork fails to meet fire safety requirements, particularly concerning smoke retention and restricted access for emergency responders.”
“There were no further questions or debate.”
Minutes
The committee vote
Councillor Green proposed approval and Councillor Jones seconded it; eight members voted for, with none against or abstaining.
“For (8): Councillors Fletcher, Sisterson, Cherry, Green, Jones, Kelly, Panjala, Shinnick Against (0): Abstain (0):”
Minutes
The decision
The committee approved the recommendation to authorise the Chief Planning Officer to grant planning permission subject to the stated conditions.
“That the Chief Planning Officer be authorised to GRANT planning permission for the development subject to those reasons set out in section 16 of this report.”
Minutes
Sources
- Thurrock Planning Committee minutes, 10 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Thurrock's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Thurrock Planning Committee
- Council
- Thurrock
- Date
- Tuesday 10 February 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 8 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Thurrock committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
30 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.