Replacement dwelling at The Garden Lodge Marsh Court Road, Stockbridge
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Test Valley Southern Area Planning Committee on 17 Mar 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed demolishing the existing dwelling and ancillary structures and building a replacement dwelling with stores, landscaping and parking.
“SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.1 The application site is located to the north of 1 Marsh Court Cottages and is accessed from a private access track serving the application site and 2-4 Marsh Court Cottages. There is an existing single storey dwelling on the site which is in a state of disrepair.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
An earlier lawful development certificate confirmed that the existing building was lawfully used as a single dwelling.
“HISTORY 4.1 25/00918/CLEN - Application for a lawful development certificate for existing use as single dwelling. Certificate issued 01.07.25”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended permission subject to a legal agreement securing the dwelling as a self-build unit and a range of conditions.
“CONCLUSION 9.1 The proposals are in accordance with the policies of the TVBRP and the VDS.”
“RECOMMENDATION PERMISSION subject to and completion of an s106 Legal Agreement to secure the dwelling as self-build unit of accommodation: The development hereby permitted shall be begun within three years from the date of this permission. Reason: To comply with the provision of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. 2.”
Officer report
Main planning effects
Officers considered the replacement dwelling would not be more visually intrusive, would have neutral heritage impact and would not harm trees, amenity, ecology, highways or flooding interests.
“The supporting text to Policy COM12 states that the impact of a replacement dwelling is likely to increase with its size especially in relation to its impact on surroundings. For this reason, planning applications for replacement dwellings which would be more than 50% greater in volume (measured externally) than the original dwelling will normally be resisted.”
“Impact on amenity Policy LHW4 of the TVBRLP requires development to provide adequate amenity for future occupiers. The existing off-site Ash trees would overshadow the proposed garden area in the afternoon and may also result in adverse impacts from tree detritus, but that is the same situation for the existing dwelling and garden, and the proposals would not therefore result in a significant impact on the amenity of the occupiers.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Conservation raised heritage and design comments, while ecology, environmental protection, highways, landscape and trees raised no objection, subject to conditions where stated.
“Ecology: No objection subject to conditions and informatives.”
“Trees: No objection subject to conditions.”
Officer report
Objections received
The parish council and eight objection letters raised concerns about countryside location, scale, landscape and heritage harm, overdevelopment, future roof use, parking and highway safety.
“REPRESENTATIONS 6.1 Stockbridge Parish Council: Object (comments summarised below): • Countryside location. • Scale. • Landscape harm. • Harm to the setting of Marsh Court. • Overdevelopment. • Future occupation of the roof void. • Parking and highway safety. • No justification or functional requirement. • No public benefits to outweigh the harm.”
Officer report
The committee vote
Councillor M Cooper proposed the officer recommendation, Councillor A Dowden seconded it, and the motion was carried.
“The Officer’s recommendation, as per the agenda and update paper, was proposed by Councillor M Cooper and seconded by Councillor A Dowden. Upon being put to the vote the motion was carried.”
Minutes
The decision
Permission was granted after delegating completion of a legal agreement securing the dwelling as a self-build unit.
“Delegate to the Director of Planning and Development to: • Complete a s106 agreement to secure the dwelling as a self-build unit of accommodation. Then PERMISSION subject to: The development hereby permitted shall be begun within three years from the date of this permission. Reason: To comply with the provision of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. 2.”
Minutes
Sources
- Test Valley Southern Area Planning Committee minutes, 17 March 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Test Valley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Test Valley
- Date
- Tuesday 17 March 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Test Valley committee decisions →
This committee's year
17 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.