Two canopy workshops at Willbox Crescent Estate, Nursling

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Test Valley Southern Area Planning Committee on 23 Sept 2025.

25/01506/FULLSApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed relocating two canopy workshops for container repairs, maintenance and fitting out prefabricated containers into accommodation units.

“PROPOSAL 3.1 The proposal is for the installation of two canopy workshops to be used for the repair and maintenance of storage containers as well as works fitting out storage containers into accommodation units. It is noted the supporting information refers to the works fitting out containers as qualifying as Class E(g) (iii) however, it is considered this activity qualifies as Class B2 with the storage use qualifying as Class B8.”

Officer report

The site

The site is part of an industrial estate used for container storage, fabrication and distribution near the M27 carriageway.

“SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.1 The application site is an industrial estate known as Crescent Estates, located on the west side of Station Road in close proximity to the point the M27 carriageway passes over.”

“The application relates to the northern section of the industrial estate which has historically been in use for the storage of containers and is currently in use for the storage, fabrication and distribution of containers.”

Officer report

Planning history

The existing workshops were unauthorised after an earlier refusal, and an appeal against the related enforcement notice was dismissed.

“RELEVANT HISTORY 4.1 APP/C1760/C/25/3362314 – Appeal against the corresponding enforcement notice for the development subject to application reference 22/03315/FULLS (paragraph 4.2). Appeal dismissed, decision issued on 25.06.2025.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended permission because they considered the proposal acceptable and consistent with local plan policies, subject to conditions and a satisfactory National Highways response.

“This recommendation is subject to a satisfactory consultation response from National Highways and the imposition or amendment of planning conditions as required.”

“RECOMMENDATION Delegate to the Head of Planning and Building for: • Receipt of satisfactory consultation response from National Highways and the imposition/amendment of planning conditions as required; Then PERMISSION subject to the following conditions and notes. The development hereby permitted shall be begun within three years from the date of this permission.”

Officer report

Officers’ assessment

Officers considered conditions would control noise, working hours, appearance, lighting, ecology and construction impacts, while highway effects would remain acceptable.

“It is acknowledged the Environmental Protection officer has also requested a planning condition limiting the proposed use to only comprise the tools identified in the submitted noise impact report. However, this suggested control is not considered to be appropriate as a planning condition, as it will not be possible to effectively monitor and enforce the use of particular tools given the location of the application site within the wider Crescent Estate.”

“The proposed canopy workshops comprise the use of storage containers for the external walls with a white canopy material forming the external roof. Whilst the appearance of storage containers as external walls is considered acceptable given the existing baseline as a storage container site, it is considered the appearance of the white canopy roof material is visually at odds with the wider application site and landscape.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Ecology, environmental protection, highways and public rights of way raised no objection subject to conditions or notes, while National Highways’ response was awaited.

“CONSULTATIONS 5.1 Ecology – No objection subject to conditions and notes.”

“Environmental Protection – No objection subject to conditions.”

Officer report

The committee vote

Councillor Cooper proposed the agenda motion, Councillor A Dowden seconded it, and the motion was carried.

“The motion as set out in the agenda was proposed by Councillor Cooper and seconded by Councillor A Dowden. Upon being put to the vote the motion was carried.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Test Valley Southern Area Planning Committee minutes, 23 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Test Valley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 23 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

6 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →