Battery storage facility at Land West Of Station Road, Nursling, Southampton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Test Valley Southern Area Planning Committee on 16 Dec 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought a battery storage facility with containers, transformers, access, acoustic fencing, landscaping and surface water measures.
“PROPOSAL 3.1 The application seeks permission for the erection of a battery storage facility which would comprise of 44 battery containers, 6 transformers, 11 invertor units, a switchgear container, a pumping container, a substation. An access road would be provided from the existing estate road. To the perimeter would be an acoustic fence with perimeter landscaping.”
Officer report
The site
The 1.78-hectare grassed field lies beside an industrial estate, the M27 and a public right of way, with trees and shrubs around its boundaries.
“SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.1 The application site comprises a parcel of land that forms 1.78 ha of a grassed field located via the Crescent Industrial Estate. The industrial site to the east comprises mainly of storage and distribution type uses and is served by an established vehicular access from Station Road. Shrubs and trees line the boundary of the site along with post and wire fencing.”
Officer report
Earlier permissions
Two earlier permissions covered energy facilities on the site, including a 20MW short-term plant and a gas-fired energy reserve facility.
“HISTORY 4.1 18/01837/FULLS Erection of a 20MW embedded short term plant building, auxiliary equipment, substation, landscaping, hard standing, access, and associated works. Permission subject to conditions 22.11.2018”
“16/00815/FULLS Development of a gas fired energy reserve facility and associated ancillary equipment and components. Permission subject to conditions 21.11.2016”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended permission because national energy benefits and other material considerations outweighed the conflict with countryside policy, subject to conditions.
“Conclusion on the Principle of Development The proposed battery storage is contrary to criterion a) and b) of Policy COM2, as there are no applicable policy exceptions for this type of development, and it is not considered essential that a battery storage site is located within the countryside.”
“In accordance with section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (2004), an assessment of other material considerations has been undertaken and concluded to outweigh the identified conflict with the development framework of the RLP.”
Officer report
Main planning effects
Officers found the proposal acceptable for landscape, biodiversity, safety, water management, highways and residential amenity, subject to mitigation and conditions.
“Biodiversity Net Gain The proposed development is required to demonstrate a 10% increase in biodiversity. The application has been supported by biodiversity net gain calculations which have been reviewed by the Ecology Officer. The proposal would result in an increase of 14.23% in biodiversity and therefore this is considered acceptable. A biodiversity net gain plan would be secured via a suitably worded condition.”
“Impact on Residential Amenity The nearest residential dwellings are the properties on the opposite side of Station Road. These are located between 280 metres and 300 metres to the east of the site.”
Officer report
What consultees said
Highways, National Highways, landscape, environmental protection, trees and fire services raised no objection subject to conditions, while drainage information remained subject to consultation.
“CONSULTATIONS 5.1 Highways – No objection subject to conditions.”
“Lead Flood Authority (HCC) – Further information required. The revised surface water drainage layout and revised hydraulic calculations resolve our previous comments regarding the level of detail. We consider the hydraulic design of the proposed drainage network is appropriate. The proposed drainage strategy for the site appears appropriate although we would encourage the use of gravity features where possible over pumped systems.”
Officer report
Objections received
The parish council and residents raised concerns about landscape, biodiversity, flooding, traffic, parking, noise, fire, construction and cumulative impacts.
“REPRESENTATIONS Expired 10.07.2025 6.1 Nursling and Rownhams Parish Council – Objection. Development would adversely impact on the landscape character and the adjacent Test Way. There is insufficient information relating to the impact of the development on biodiversity. There is concern that the proposed development would increase the risk of flooding in the area.”
Officer report
The committee vote
Councillor Cooper proposed the agenda motion, Councillor Dowden seconded it, and the motion was carried; an amendment added construction timings.
“Councillor M Cooper proposed and Councillor A Dowden seconded the motion as set out in the agenda and update paper. Upon being put to the vote the motion was carried.”
“Councillor Bundy proposed and Councillor A Dowden seconded an amendment to include timings as set out in Condition 15.”
Minutes
The decision
Permission was granted subject to consultation with the Lead Local Flood Authority, any required drainage conditions and the listed planning conditions.
“Consultation with the Local Lead Flood Authority on the amended drainage layout plan and the imposition of planning conditions as required. Then delegate to the Director of Planning and Development for: PERMISSION subject to: Consultation with the Local Lead Flood Authority on the amended drainage layout plan and the imposition of planning conditions as required. Then delegate to the Director of Planning and Development for:”
“PERMISSION subject to: The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in accordance with the details shown on the submitted plans, numbers: • 311 A Acoustic Fence Panel • 304 A Auxillary Transformer • 301 Battery Containers • 302 Invertor • JS017_001B Landscape Proposals Plan • AVON104/100B/P Surface Water Drainage Layout • 106 Proposed Elevations • 103 Proposed Site Layout • 308 Pumping Station Container • 310 Security Fence Panel • 307 Security Fence…”
Minutes
Extra conditions added
The permission included a battery safety management plan and restricted construction activity to specified weekday and Saturday hours.
“A comprehensive review of the space between units in line with the UL9540A testing information to establish whether there is potential for fire to spread between units 3. A review the detailed battery safety management plan and any associated fire safety systems 4. Details of the proposed battery chemistry 5.”
Minutes
Sources
- Test Valley Southern Area Planning Committee minutes, 16 December 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Test Valley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Test Valley
- Date
- Tuesday 16 December 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Test Valley committee decisions →
This committee's year
14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.