Single-storey rear extension at 11 Overhill Road, Purley
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Sutton Planning Committee on 4 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a four-metre-deep, single-storey rear extension with a three-metre-high flat roof for a larger family kitchen and lounge.
“The application seeks planning permission for the erection of a single storey rear extension.”
“The proposal seeks planning permission for the erection of a single storey rear extension to create a larger family kitchen and lounge to the rear of the house. The proposed extension would be 4 metres deep and would have a flat roof with a maximum height of 3 metres.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is a detached house at the northern end of Overhill Road, in a mainly residential area beside Roundshaw Park and the Croydon boundary.
“The application site relates to 11 Overhill Road situated at the northern end of Overhill Road. The property comprises a detached dwelling that has been extended at ground, first and roof level as indicated in the planning history section of the report further below.”
“The surrounding area is predominantly residential in character, comprising two-storey detached houses to the west and south. To the north of the site lies Roundshaw Park and the site shares its east boundary with the London Borough of Croydon.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier permissions covered extensions, dormers and roof alterations, while a 2004 application for extensions was refused.
“D2004/53190 Erection of a first floor extension and provision of two ground floor bay windows at front and erection of a first floor and part ground floor extension at rear. Permission refused 13.12.2004”
“D2011/64789 Enlargement of front dormer window, enlargement of rear dormer window, provision of a pitched roof over existing front extension, and new pitched roof over dwelling involving the raising of the ridge height. Permission granted 29.09.2011”
Officer report
Design and neighbours
The modest height and depth, matching materials and boundary separation were considered sufficient to avoid unacceptable effects on appearance, privacy, light, outlook, noise and disturbance.
“Increased Noise and Disturbance The proposed development would create an extension to a residential property, which would not change the residential use of the building and would involve alteration works to a residential dwelling. As such, it is considered that the proposal would not result in an unacceptable increase in noise and disturbance to the detriment of neighbouring properties.”
“Loss of Light The proposed single storey rear extension would be located to the north and set in by 1.1 metres from the shared boundary with No. Overhill Road and 3.5 metres from the flank and rear elevations of this property. Given its modest height, location to the north and separation distance from the rear windows and garden of No 9, the proposal would not result in an adverse impact on the occupiers of this property in terms of light.”
Officer report
Public response
A site notice was displayed, no representation letters were received, and there were no councillor or internal and external consultation responses.
“A site notice was displayed in the vicinity of the site on 14th October 2025.”
“No letters of representation have been received in relation to the application.”
Officer report
Committee consideration
The committee agreed to proceed directly to a vote on the officers’ recommendation.
“The Committee agreed to the Chair's proposal to proceed directly to a vote on the application. A poll vote on the officers’ recommendation to grant permission was held in accordance with Standing Order 31.4, when there voted:”
Minutes
The vote and decision
The committee voted on the recommendation to grant permission and resolved to approve the extension subject to the stated conditions.
“RESOLVED: To GRANT planning permission, subject to the conditions outlined at Appendix B.”
Minutes
Conditions attached
The conditions require approved plans, timely commencement, matching materials, no use of the flat roof as a terrace, and compliance with the fire safety strategy.
“SECOND SCHEDULE Condition(s): 1) The approved development shall be carried out in accordance with the following drawing/details: Site Location Plan (Ref: OI1328847), Existing Block Plan - 11 Overhill Road Purley, Proposed Block Plan - 11 Overhill Road Purley, 0811-1573 A (Existing plans and elevations), 0811-1573 A (Proposed plans and elevations), Fire Safety Statement - 11 Overhill Road, Purley, CR8 2JD.”
“4) The flat roof of the single storey rear extension hereby approved shall not be used, all or in part, as a terrace or other amenity space. No railings, fences, walls or other means of enclosure shall be erected on this flat roof, and no alterations shall be carried out to the elevation of the application property to form access onto the roof.”
Officer report
Sources
- Sutton Planning Committee minutes, 4 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Sutton's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Sutton Planning Committee
- Council
- Sutton
- Date
- Wednesday 4 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Sutton committee decisions →
This committee's year
22 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.