One-person care home at 15 Waterdale Close, Hardwicke, Gloucester
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Stroud Development Control Committee on 27 Jan 2026.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
What was proposed
The application sought to change a single dwelling into a care home for one young person with complex needs, without external alterations.
“The Senior Planning Officer introduced the item as a change of use from a single dwelling in a residential area to a care home for up to one young person with complex needs. The proposals included no external changes, but internal adaptations included: • A reduction in the number of bedrooms from six to one, • Installation of an ensuite bathroom, • Addition of a therapy room, sensory room, and office space, • Creation of a sleeping room for the carers.”
Minutes
Earlier application and highways
An earlier proposal for more children and staff was refused because it intensified the dwelling and lacked sufficient parking and safe access.
“The Senior Planning Officer informed the Committee that there had been a previous application for a greater number of children, with up to four staff. This had been refused by Officers as the site would have been intensified to a degree which went beyond that of a private residential dwelling. Gloucestershire County Council (GCC) Highways had also raised an objection with the previous application due to the lack of parking provision and safety of access.”
Minutes
Officer advice
The recommendation was for approval because one resident and two carers reduced intensification, while updated tracking showed vehicles could enter and leave forwards.
“Officers considered that the reduction in occupancy to one individual with two carers at any one time reduced the intensification from the previous application, as the existing dwelling could have feasibly housed a large family with a number of vehicles. GCC Highways had removed their objection in the late pages after the applicant had provided an updated vehicle tracking plan, showing that vehicles could enter and leave in a forward gear.”
Minutes
Who spoke
The ward councillor’s statement, the parish council and a member of the public spoke against the application.
The vote
The motion carried with eight votes in favour, two against and two abstentions.
“After being put to a vote, the motion was carried with eight votes in favour, two votes against, and two abstentions.”
Minutes
The decision
Planning permission was granted.
“RESOVED That planning permission was granted.”
Minutes
Sources
- Stroud Development Control Committee minutes, 27 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Stroud's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Stroud Development Control Committee
- Council
- Stroud
- Date
- Tuesday 27 January 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 8 for, 2 against, 2 abstained
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Stroud committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
5 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.