Two rear Juliet balconies at Finsbury Barn, Long Row, Tibenham

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by South Norfolk Broadland South Norfolk Development Management (Planning) Committee on 18 Feb 2026.

2025/3531Approved

What was proposed

The application sought two rear Juliet balconies and the return of a front Juliet balcony to a window.

“Applicant’s Name: [name withheld] Address Finsbury Barn, Long Row, Tibenham, Norfolk, NR16 1PG Proposal Variation of condition 1 and 4 - windows (inclusion of 2 No Juliet balconies at rear and revision of Juliet balcony at front back to window) of consented permission 2023/1249 (which gave consent for conversion of Agricultural Building to a Dwelling (variation of conditions 2, 5 and 12 of 2018/0143) dated 04 March 2025”

“Condition 1 refers to the approved plans, and this application seeks to change the two north facing windows on the rear elevation from windows to Juliet balconies. It is noted that the previously approved window to the south facing front elevation serving a bedroom is at present built as a Juliet balcony.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The building is in open countryside, beside a public right of way, with farmland to the north and homes to the east, south and west.

“To the north the building faces directly onto the Public Right of Ways (PRoW) bordering the site beyond which are agricultural fields. There are new residential properties to the east of the site, and existing residential development to the south and west. The barn conversion can be seen from Long Road to the south of the site, in the context of recently constructed dwellings in lieu of agricultural conversions approved under Class Q (2021/2206).”

“The site is situated in the open countryside and is not located within a conservation area. The nearest listed building is Orchard Farmhouse, which is Grade II listed, and lies approximately 90m to the rear of the site accessed via Cherry Tree Road.”

Officer report

Earlier planning decisions

Earlier approvals covered agricultural building conversions, drainage and tree matters, materials, and a retrospective garage and residential curtilage.

“2020/2324 Notification for Prior Approval for a proposed change of use and associated building works to part of 1 no agricultural building to 2 no dwellinghouses (QA and QB) Approved…”

“2023/3001 Erection of proposed garage and change of use of agricultural land to residential curtilage (retrospective) Approved…”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval with conditions because the changes were acceptable in design and would not significantly harm neighbours or the public right of way.

“The variation of conditions allows for the introduction/ retention of two Juliet balconies located at the north (rear) elevation of the dwellinghouse, replacing two windows. The outlook from this elevation is over farmland, with the nearest neighbouring dwellinghouse on this elevation being some distance away.”

“Overall, the alterations are considered acceptable with regard to design and scale and will not cause harm to the site or the general character and appearance of the area. The application is therefore considered to accord with Policy 3 of the GNLP and Policy DM3.8 and DM4.5 of the SNLP.”

Officer report

Effects on neighbours and route

The rear balconies faced fields with substantial separation from homes, while replacing the front balcony with a window reduced overlooking; effects on the route did not justify refusal.

“It is noted that a Juliet balcony currently exists on the front (south) elevation of the dwelling. During the application process, the officer requested amended plans to revert this back to a window, thereby reinstating the approved arrangement in place of the existing Juliet balcony.”

“Concerns have been raised as summarised in Section 4 of this report regarding the balconies and glazing causing visual intrusion and impacting public amenity on the PRoW located immediately north of the approved dwelling. The officer undertook a site visit where they were able to experience the views from the inside of the property, particularly those from the balconies to the rear of the dwellinghouse and from the PRoW.”

Officer report

Objections raised

A neighbour objected to overlooking, visual intrusion, loss of character, noise, light spill, flooding risk, unauthorised works and non-compliance.

“Full-height French doors and projecting balconies oversail the PROW, creating a sense of surveillance and reducing enjoyment of the route. • Contravenes Policy DM 1.4 (Environmental quality and local distinctiveness). • Conversion from single-storey agricultural building to two-storey with balconies alters scale and character. • Visually dominant and oppressive from the PROW; loss of agricultural character. • Breaches Policy DM 3.8 (Design Principles).”

“Additional unauthorised works on PROW • Previous fencing and heat pump installed without consent; attempts to fence off PROW in separate application. • Full-height lobby windows allowed retrospectively despite not being in original permission. • Building completed in 2023; developer repeatedly advised balconies not permitted. • Property marketed for sale and further applications submitted instead of compliance.”

Officer report

The committee vote

Members voted unanimously to approve the application with conditions.

“: Variation of condition 1 and 4 - windows (inclusion of 2 No Juliet balconies at rear and revision of Juliet balcony at front back to window) of consented permission 2023/1249 (which gave consent for conversion of Agricultural Building to a Dwelling (variation of conditions 2, 5 and 12 of 2018/0143) dated 04 March 2025”

“Members voted unanimously for approval with Conditions:”

Minutes

The decision

The application was approved with conditions covering plans, boundaries, materials, drainage, parking, glazing and replacement of the front balcony with a window.

“In accordance with plans. Boundary treatments to be submitted. Previously undiscovered contamination 4. Window specification details 5. External Materials 6. Construction of vehicular access 7. Provision and retention of parking/turning area. Tree protection and in accordance with AIA 9. Surface water drainage 10. Foul water disposal to sealed system or private treatment plant 11. Windows to be obscure glazed 12.”

Minutes

Sources

  • South Norfolk Broadland South Norfolk Development Management (Planning) Committee minutes, 18 February 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of South Norfolk Broadland's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 18 February 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →