27 dwellings at Land West Of Loddon Road, Ditchingham

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by South Norfolk Broadland South Norfolk Development Management (Planning) Committee on 11 Mar 2026.

2025/1083Approved

What was proposed

The application sought 27 homes, access, public open space, landscaping and associated infrastructure, including 18 market and 9 affordable dwellings.

“This application seeks full planning permission for the erection of 27 dwellings, vehicular access, pedestrian access, public open space, landscaping and associated infrastructure.”

“This would consist of 18 open market and 9 affordable dwellings as a mixture of 1, 2, 3 and 4-bedroom houses and bungalows. Vehicular access would be taken off Loddon Road which requires the removal of one Oak tree (T6). A further Oak tree (T8) is also recommended for removal (due to its declining condition relative to the highway) however this will also facilitate a further pedestrian access onto Loddon Road.”

Officer report

Site and planning history

The 1.75-hectare vacant former arable field lies beside existing homes, trees, Broome Heath and village facilities; an older 1970 application was refused.

“The site, which totals around 1.75 hectares, sits on a vacant piece of land, a former enclosed agricultural arable field, which is positioned between post-war residential dwellings in form of estate housing to the south-west on Waveney Road (which is also the extent of Ditchingham’s current recognised development boundary) and ribbon form style detached bungalows to the northeast on Tunneys Lane.”

“Ditchingham is a service village, which has some local facilities and provisions of note such as a village hall, convenience stores (including a Post Office) and a primary school. The village is also served by bus services through Loddon Road (close to the site) between Beccles – Diss / Bungay and Hollow Hill Road between Norwich – Bungay / Halesworth. Both routes have reasonably frequent timetables.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because housing, economic, social, access, open-space and environmental benefits were not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by harm.

“The ‘Principle of Development’ section of this report explains that applications for planning permission should be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.”

“The proposal will provide for modest economic benefits from its construction and spending from future occupants of the dwellings, social benefits from the delivery of sustainably designed and located new housing including affordable housing, new public open space and off-site highway improvements enhancing the pedestrian and public transport credentials of the immediate area.”

Officer report

What people said

Residents raised concerns about density, rural character, wildlife, infrastructure, traffic, flooding, privacy, trees, drainage and archaeology, while some broadly supported the plans.

“Proposed density concerning • Development / encroachment could harm rural identity of area • Barn owls do exist in the area (reference to Ecological Assessment) as do turtle doves and nightingales • Site lies in the Broads National Park, close to designated County Wildlife Sites, SSSIs and areas of privately maintained conservation and habitat restoration • Ecological sensitivity in the area needs to be supported • Light pollution impact upon local wildlife and rural…”

“Site queried if in Green Belt and has had previous applications declined • Concerns with the changes to Loddon Road (widening, loss of verge etc) • Pathway through estate beneficial but exits on blind corner • Speed limit changes along Loddon Road questioned and whether could be extended further • Impact upon local wildlife / wildlife in the area • Tunneys Lane flooding from water run off • Assurances required that foundations and chimney of proposed plot 11 will not…”

Officer report

The drainage issue

Anglian Water recommended refusal over foul-drainage capacity, but officers considered statutory duties and found no evident immediate environmental impact, subject to resolving controls.

“In respect of foul drainage, it is proposed to make a connection to the Anglian Water (AW) network by connecting into the existing foul drainage that is routed along Loddon Road to the south-west. The first priority under the Building Regulations is for foul drainage to connect to a public foul sewer system. Only if a public foul sewer is not available, should an alternative means of disposal be considered.”

“Officers are reviewing legal advice on the proper approach to be taken in on this matter respect of conditions. Therefore, Officers seek delegated authority to determine the final conditions / controls in respect of the foul network following its review of legal advice which may result in the Council either adding a foul drainage condition which will require the developer to finalise the proposals with the Local Planning Authority at the discharge of condition stage,…”

Officer report

The committee vote

Members voted seven to zero, with one abstention, to authorise approval subject to Anglian Water, conditions, updates and a Section 106 agreement.

“Decision : Members voted 7 – 0 with one abstention to authorise the Assistant Director of Planning to approve subject to resolution of the matter relating to Anglian Water, conditions, any updates needed following the publication of the new NPPF, and the resolution of a Section 106 agreement to secure affordable housing, open space, monitoring fee and RAMS.”

Minutes

Sources

  • South Norfolk Broadland South Norfolk Development Management (Planning) Committee minutes, 11 March 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of South Norfolk Broadland's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 11 March 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

17 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →