Industrial park at Land Off Hards Lane, Frognall

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by South Kesteven Planning Committee on 28 Aug 2025.

S23/0401Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed 17 commercial units across four buildings, with parking, shared access, landscaping and drainage connections.

“The submitted documentation indicates that the site would be developed for a range of commercial units having a gross internal floorspace of 2290m 2 . Within the Planning, Design and Access Statement, it is stated: “At the frontage of the site is a development of 10 small industrial units for rental to small local businesses with 7 No larger industrial units at the rear for individual or full site rental with turning facilities for larger vehicles and HGV’s”.”

“The access point for the overall site would be situated to the east of this row. It would be shared with the development proposed under ref. S23/0404 to the east. External colours are all stated within the application form to be grey/dark grey. Enclosures are generally formed using 1.8m high green weldmesh fencing. 2.8 56 Parking spaces are proposed within the site to serve the development for staff and visitors.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site was a flat field beside Hards Lane, between established commercial areas, with a hedgerow on its western boundary.

“The application site is situated on the south side of Hards Lane, the road leading east from Frognall out into agricultural land. The ground is generally flat; the site is a long rectangular field stretching south from Hards Lane to a linear field drain (site length approximately 164m, width 50m with an overall area of approximately 0.82 hectares). There are no enclosures or trees on the site of any note.”

“S23/0404, for an office and production building. The application was submitted at the same time as S23/0401and is discussed elsewhere in this agenda. Description of Proposal…”

Officer report

Planning history

There was no relevant history for the site, although the proposal was linked to a separate neighbouring application.

“None relevant to the current application site. Although this application should be read in conjunction with S23/0404 considered elsewhere within this agenda.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members discussed missing pedestrian and cycle links, biodiversity net gain, increased HGV and traffic movements, and the wider road network.

“One Member was disappointed at the lack of pedestrian and cyclist provision could have provided a link from the site to Frognall. • Concern was raised around biodiversity net gain. Policy EN2 of the Local Plan required a net gain, however, evidence of net gain from this proposal had been deferred and not received.”

“Concern was raised on the increase of HGV and traffic movements due to the adjacent site and the number of units on this proposed site. • A query was raised on whether an impact assessment had taken place on the wider road network rather than the incoming and access for the site.”

Minutes

The vote

The application was proposed, seconded and agreed for approval subject to conditions.

“It was proposed, seconded and AGREED to APPROVE the application, subject to the following conditions:”

Minutes

Sources

  • South Kesteven Planning Committee minutes, 28 August 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of South Kesteven's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Thursday 28 August 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →