Single-storey rear extension at 28 Tolls Lane, Holbeach, Spalding

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by South Holland Planning Committee on 7 May 2025.

H09-0200-25Approved

What was proposed

The application sought permission for a single-storey rear extension measuring 7.4 metres deep, 5.1 metres wide and 2.9 metres high.

“You can view this application on the Council's web site at http://planning.sholland.gov.uk/OcellaWeb/planningDetails?reference=H09-0200-25 SOUTH HOLLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL Report of:Lead Development Management Planner (Interim) - BBC & SHDC To:Planning Committee - 07 May 2025 (Author:Jess Hill - Senior Planning Consultant) Purpose:To consider Planning Application H09-0200-25 Application Number:H09-0200-25Date Received:26 February 2025 Application Type:FULL Description:Single…”

“The extension is proposed to feature a flat roof form, measuring 2.9m in height. 3.0SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1The site comprises land at 28 Tolls Lane, Holbeach. The site features a semi-detached two storey dwelling with a hipped roof form. The dwelling also features a two-storey side extension which features a flat roof.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval, finding the extension acceptable in principle, visually, in relation to neighbouring amenity, and on highway grounds.

“7.17These policies accord with the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework (December 2024) and require that design which is inappropriate to the local area, or which fails to maximise opportunities for improving the character and quality of an area, will not be acceptable.”

“7.28The proposed extension is relatively close to the boundary with 26 Tolls Lane, which is located to the north of the site. Tolls Lane features a relatively large garden and as such the proposed extension would not overshadow large portions of the neighbouring amenity space or the dwelling itself. 7.29Therefore, the impact of the proposed development on the amenity of neighbouring properties and future occupants would be acceptable.”

Officer report

Need for extra space

The extension would provide two bedrooms and a bathroom, with the additional ground-floor space supported by identified medical and caring needs.

“The extension is approximately 2.6m from the boundary to the south with 30 Tolls Lane. 7.21Within the extension, two bedrooms are proposed and a bathroom. The purpose of the extension is to provide additional living space for occupants within the dwelling who have medical and caring needs.”

“The proposed extension is relatively large; however, it is acknowledged that the additional space is required, and also the space needs to be provided at the ground floor level due to the medical needs of the occupants. Although the proposed extension is relatively large, it would be positioned towards the rear of the site and would therefore only be partly visible from the street scene.”

Officer report

Resident views

The application was publicised, but no letters of representation were received.

“Policy 01 - Spatial Strategy Policy 02 - Development Management Policy 03 - Design of New Development Policy 04 - Approach to Flood Risk Policy 36 - Vehicle and Cycle Parking APPENDIX 6 - Parking Standards 4.4National Guidance 4.5National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), 2024 4.6Section 2 - Achieving sustainable development Section 4 - Decision-making Section 11 - Making effective use of land Section 12 - Achieving well-designed places Section 14 - Meeting the challenge of…”

“In this instance, no letters of representation have been received. 7.0CONSIDERATIONS 7.1Planning Considerations 7.2Section 38 (6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, as amended, requires that…”

Officer report

Committee debate

Members later raised concern that the parking assessment relied on children’s bedrooms and might not apply to future residents.

“Amendment following 16 July 2025 Committee Meeting:”

“Members debated the matter and fully explored the details of the application in light of prevailing policies and guidance, with the following comments being received: • Concern was raised that the Parking Assessment stated that there would be no increase in parking due to the extension being for children’s bedrooms. This was specific to the current resident and may not apply for future residents.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee granted permission subject to the conditions set out in the report.

“That permission be granted subject to the conditions outlined at section 9.0 of the report.”

“(Moved by Councillor Brewis, Seconded by Councillor Beal)”

Minutes

Sources

  • South Holland Planning Committee minutes, 7 May 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of South Holland's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 7 May 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

13 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →