Eight semi-detached homes at Storage Land Rear Of 214 Cooks Lane, Kingshurst, Solihull
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Solihull Planning Committee on 17 Jun 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed eight semi-detached homes, with four two-bedroom and four three-bedroom dwellings, each having on-site parking.
“Proposal: Erection of 8 semi-detached dwellings.”
“The application seeks full planning permission for the erection of 8 no. semi- detached dwellings with on-site parking for each dwelling, 4 dwellings of which would have 2 bedrooms and the other 4 dwellings would have 3 bedrooms.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
The site has a long residential planning history, including approval for an identical eight-home scheme used for supported living.
“This site benefits from an extensive planning history over a number of years including applications that have been granted for residential development with the most recent approval in 2018 accessed off Hillside Gardens which is a cul de sac. The earliest approved application for residential use dates back to 2005.”
“-PL/2018/00423/PPFL- Erect 8 No. semi-detached dwellings to be used for supported living. ( C3 use) APPROVED AT COMMITTEE 29/11/2018”
Officer report
What officers advised
Officers considered the proposal acceptable in principle, suitably designed, accessible, and beneficial for housing supply without material harm outweighing its benefits.
“The second strand of Policy P5 that deals with new housing on unallocated sites relates to borough wide housing need. If there is a housing need, Policy P5 supports the principle of the proposal. The question of housing need is set out within the Framework. The Framework advises that demonstrable unmet need in the case of applications involving the provision of housing includes the lack of a five-year housing land supply.”
“The Council completed its annual monitoring report, which looked at the Borough’s housing land supply as of 1 April 2024 and demonstrates that the Borough has at best 2.13 years housing land supply. This was challenged at a recent Public Inquiry associated with a housing scheme at 722 Kenilworth Road (APP/Q4625/W/24/3351230) whereby the appellant suggested the land supply position was 1.11 years.”
Officer report
Main effects considered
The assessment considered residential policy, local character, neighbours’ living conditions, highway safety, contamination, landscape, ecology and drainage.
“Whether the proposal provides an appropriate residential use in accordance with relevant planning policy; • The effect of the development on the appearance of street scene and character and local distinctiveness of the local area; • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties and • The effect of the proposal on highway safety and the free flow of the road.”
“Contaminated Land; • Landscape; • Ecology; • Drainage; • Climate Change; • Affordable Housing and CIL; and • Planning balance and conclusions.”
Officer report
Consultees’ responses
Water, drainage, contamination, ecology and highways consultees raised no objection subject to conditions, while landscape and affordable housing consultees raised no objection.
“Severn Trent Water – No Objection subject to condition and notes…”
“SMBC Highways - No objection subject to conditions.”
Officer report
What residents said
Fourteen neighbouring residents objected over scale, overdevelopment, privacy, light, noise, bins, construction, access, traffic, parking and turning.
“Impact on light to neighbouring house and garden; • Overlooking; • Loss of privacy; • Overbearing impact; • Proximity of buildings, parking bays and small gardens to neighbouring properties would cause light and noise pollution; and • Location of bins; • Noise and disturbance.”
“Legal Access arrangements; • Emergency vehicles access concerns; • Impact on traffic congestion on surrounding streets; • Increase in parking congestion in area; • Insufficient parking spaces; • Lack of turning for bigger vehicles needing to turn and reverse on this site.”
Officer report
Who spoke
A parish councillor and a ward councillor spoke against the application, while a statement of support was read out on behalf of another person.
The committee’s decision
The committee gave conditional approval in line with the officer recommendation.
“PL/2025/01267/PPFL - STORAGE LAND REAR OF 214 COOKS LANE Conditional approval as per the officer recommendation.”
Minutes
Sources
- Solihull Planning Committee minutes, 17 June 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Solihull's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Solihull Planning Committee
- Council
- Solihull
- Date
- Wednesday 17 June 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Solihull committee decisions →
This committee's year
54 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 9 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.