One flat and two shops at 12 Sandgate Road, Folkestone

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Shepway Planning and Licensing Committee on 16 Dec 2025.

25/1530/FHApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed one one-bedroom flat at the rear of the ground-floor shop and two smaller retail units at the front.

“25/1530/FH Location 12 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 1DP Application Description Part change of use to rear of existing ground floor retail unit (Class E) to residential use (C3) to create 1 x 1- bed apartment, including alterations to the remaining retail unit to create 2 x smaller retail units…”

“DC/25/34 3.1. This application seeks planning permission for change of use of part of the ground floor retail unit to form one, one-bedroom flat, with the retention of the retail frontage, but splitting this into two, smaller units. 3.2.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is part of a four-storey property in Folkestone town centre and the primary shopping frontage, with flats above retail space.

“The application site is part of a substantial, four-storey property located within the defined town centre of Folkestone, and that falls within the primary shopping frontage.”

“The ground floor has a modern shopfront serving a retail space, with a Regency-styled red brick and stone detailed first and second floors, and imposing gabled dormer windows serving the roof space, with eight flats within the first, second, third floors, and extending into the loft space.”

Officer report

Earlier permissions

Earlier permissions allowed a rear one-bedroom flat and eight studio apartments within the building.

“22/0265/FH Change of use to the rear part of the existing ground floor from retail use (class e) to residential use (class c3) to create 1 x 1 bedroom flat plus alterations to existing first floor roof to create a ground floor courtyard, including associated refuse storage at ground floor.”

“Approved with conditions 21/1306/FH Conversion of first, second, third floors and loft space from ancillary storage to 8 No. residential studio apartments including a single storey extension at second floor and associated refuse storage at ground floor.”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the proposal acceptable because it would retain an active frontage, provide viable small shops and create housing without significant amenity harm.

“In terms of residential development, this is one of the most sustainable locations in the district, and the scheme therefore accords with the thrust of local and national policy in this regard. Conversion of the floorspace behind the retail frontage would both retain part of the ground floor in economic use, and an active frontage in the primary shopping area, while seeking to make a viable use of the rest of the building.”

“Concern has been raised regarding the viability of small units such as are proposed. Adopted policy is silent in this regard and does not restrict the size of units, and it is noted that an active frontage would be maintained.”

Officer report

Light and living conditions

Although daylight levels would fall below BRE guidelines, officers considered the flat’s living standards acceptable for this town-centre setting.

“The report concludes that, whilst the daylight and sunlight levels within the proposed development fall below the levels recommended within the BRE Guidelines, the proposed flat will benefit from good daylight provision to its main living areas, particularly considering its town centre location.”

“Across this, though, acceptable living standards should be maintained by ensuring reasonable daylight and sunlight levels, assessed in relation to site context and design. In dense or historic areas, full compliance with guidance such as BRE standards may be impractical; however, design consideration such as room layout and additional openings can optimise natural light and optimise natural light to ensure reasonable amenity.”

Officer report

What consultees said

Folkestone Town Council objected over natural light, while Environmental Health and Southern Water raised no objection and one neighbour made a neutral representation.

“Folkestone Town Council: Object. No natural light to principal living spaces; unacceptable level of amenity for future occupiers.”

“Southern Water: No objection. Details of foul & surface water to be provided prior to commencement of development…”

Officer report

The committee decision

Councillors voted 8–4 to grant planning permission subject to conditions and delegated authority over their wording.

“That planning permission be granted subject to the conditions set out at the end of the report and that delegated authority be given to the Chief Planning Officer to agree and finalise the wording of the conditions and add any other conditions that he considers necessary.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Shepway Planning and Licensing Committee minutes, 16 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Shepway's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Shepway
Date
Tuesday 16 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
8 for, 4 against
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

13 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →