Raised patio and balcony at 77 Trafalgar Road, Birkdale

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Sefton Planning Committee on 12 Nov 2025.

DC/2025/01229Approved

What was proposed

Permission was sought for a raised patio, balcony and covered patio area at the rear of the dwellinghouse.

“Proposal: Erection of a raised patio area, balcony and covered patio area to the rear of the dwellinghouse.”

“The application seeks permission to extend the existing raised patio area and erect a covered patio area with balcony over to the south east of the rear elevation.”

Officer report

The site

The site is a detached two-storey dwelling in a large plot within a primarily residential area.

“The site is located in a Primarily Residential Area.”

“The application site is an individual design detached two storey dwelling situated in a large plot on the northeast side of Trafalgar Road. The site is currently being extended following approval of recent application DC/2014/01014 noted below.”

Officer report

Earlier permissions

Earlier permissions covered major extensions, a raised patio, balconies, alterations, access and boundary works, while a later amendment was refused.

“DC/2024/01014 Remodelling of existing dwelling, addition of a first floor extension to the side, extension to the rear at first floor level, a single-storey rear extension with a raised patio area. Incorporating Juliet balconies at the rear, alterations to the existing garage / elevations, replacement of the front boundary wall with railings over, 2 sets of gates, new vehicular access and paving to the front of the dwelling house.”

“DC/2022/01457 Two storey side extension, single storey extension, raised patio area and dormer extensions/Juliet balconies to the rear and raising the roof height, alterations to the existing garage/elevations, replacement front boundary wall with railings over, 2 sets of gates, new vehicular access and paving to the front of the dwellinghouse. Approved January 2023.”

Officer report

Why officers recommended approval

Officers considered the proposal acceptable because it would not significantly harm neighbours and its design would complement the dwelling and area.

“The proposed extended raised patio area extends around 1.7m to the rear of the covered patio/balcony. This links with the raised patio area approved under the 2014 permission and is raised around 0.8m above rear garden level. The side wall to this extended patio varies in height and in part would allow sideways overlooking in the rear garden area of No.79.”

“While there may not be other first floor balconies to properties in the area this does not preclude this proposed balcony being considered and treated on its merits – as addressed above it isn’t considered the proposed balcony would result in any significant harm to neighbouring properties or the character of the area. The proposal therefore complies with Policy EQ2.”

Officer report

What neighbours said

Three objections raised concerns about privacy, outlook, scale, plans, precedent, policy and the cumulative effect of overlooking.

“Four neighbours were notified by letter on 1/8/2025 and renotified of amended plans on 24/9/2025.”

“Impact on privacy from proposed balcony - exacerbated by difference in land levels and angled joint boundary. • Impact on outlook from kitchen/gym – would be dominated by a solid brick/render wall over 2 storeys high. • No other similar balconies in area – would set a precedent. • Balcony is inappropriate in scale, location & impact - already significantly extended and has other outdoor spaces – balcony seems excessive.”

Officer report

Privacy safeguards

Conditions require a balcony screen and a higher obscure screen along the extended patio beside the neighbouring property.

“2) The proposed screen wall to the balcony adjacent to no. 79 indicated on plan refs 06 Rev B and 07 Rev B shall be erected prior to first use of the balcony and must remain for the duration of the use of the balcony hereby approved.”

“3) Within 1 month of the date of this decision, full details of an obscure screen to extend the height of the existing wall to the southeast edge of the extended raised patio area to a minimum height of 1.7m (measured from the patio floor level) shall be submitted to and approved by the local planning authority. The screen shall be completed prior to the first use of the extended raised patio area and shall be permanently retained in that condition thereafter.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee granted permission subject to the stated conditions, with further clarification required on balcony privacy and the boundary wall.

“The Committee considered the report of the Chief Planning Officer recommending that the above application for the erection of a raised patio area, balcony and covered patio area to the rear of the dwellinghouse be granted subject to the conditions and for the reasons stated or referred to in the report.”

“That the recommendation be approved and the application be granted subject to the conditions and for the reasons stated or referred to in the report and in Late Representations and subject to the Chief Planning Officer in consultation with the Vice Chair clarifying issues around privacy caused by the proposed balcony and around the boundary wall.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Sefton Planning Committee minutes, 12 November 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Sefton's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Sefton
Date
Wednesday 12 November 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →