Timber seating enclosure at 1 Harris Drive, Bootle

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Sefton Planning Committee on 15 Oct 2025.

DC/2025/01093Approved

What was proposed

The application sought changes to the approved outdoor seating layout, bollards and barrier system by replacing them with a timber-framed enclosure.

“Proposal: Variation of condition 2 and 3 pursuant to planning permission DC/2024/01248 refused 20.09.2024 allowed on appeal ref: APP/M4320/W/24/3356240 dated 09.04.2025 to allow alterations to layout of outside seating area bollards and barrier system to timber framed enclosure.”

Officer report

The site

The site is the external area beside a single-storey drinking establishment at a shopping parade junction in a predominantly residential area.

“The application site comprises the external area to the front of 1 Harris Drive which is a single storey building used as a drinking establishment located at the junction of Harris Drive and Hawthorne Road in Bootle. The premises are at the end of a shopping parade which runs from the corner of Hawthorne Road towards Harris Drive and accommodates a number of different commercial uses.”

Officer report

Earlier applications and appeal

Earlier permissions established the drinking establishment, while the outdoor seating proposal was refused before being allowed on appeal.

“DC/2024/00229 – Change of use from Class E to a drinking establishment (Sui Generis) with the provision of live music. Approved April 2024. (The outside seating area was removed from this scheme).”

“DC/2024/01248 – Layout of an outside seating area with vehicle bollards and barrier system. Refused September 2024. Appeal allowed April 2025.”

Officer report

Why officers recommended approval

Officers considered the smaller enclosure visually suitable, acceptable for residents and safe for pedestrians and parking, subject to conditions.

“The proposal involves the replacement of the previously approved barrier system with a timber-framed enclosure to define the outdoor seating area. The enclosure, which has already been installed, comprises horizontally arranged timber panels and occupies a smaller footprint than the original approved layout. Its reduced scale contributes to a more contained and visually coherent outdoor space.”

“Overall, the proposal is considered to have an acceptable impact on the character and appearance of the area, subject to conditions that secure its ongoing maintenance and ensure its appropriate use. Accordingly, the proposal is deemed to comply with Policy EQ2 ‘Design’.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The Highways Manager raised no objection, and the Environmental Health Manager had no objection subject to conditions.

“Highways Manager No objections to the proposal as there are no adverse highway safety implications.”

“Environmental Health Manager No objection subject to conditions.”

Officer report

Residents’ objections

Three objections raised concerns about noise, intimidation, pavement obstruction, parking, antisocial behaviour and access for deliveries.

“Three representations have been received all objecting to the proposal. The reasons for the objections are summarised below:”

“- Outside seating area is intimidating to walk around with noisy groups of people drinking and swearing - The seating area takes up a lot of pavement space along with illegal parking - Highways safety issues with structure in place and parking - Users of the seating area spill out around either side of the fence - Increase in antisocial behaviour - Chairs and tables left out past opening hours - Impact on delivery as existing shops cannot use space for parking with customers…”

Officer report

Members’ discussion

Members noted that the new timber enclosure was smaller and wanted drinking confined to the designated seating area to limit disturbance.

“Arising from the discussion Members confirmed that the new timber framed enclosure was smaller than that which had been approved on appeal, and expressed the view that, to limit disturbance to nearby residents, drinking should be confined to within that designated seating area.”

Minutes

The committee vote

The committee approved the recommendation to grant the application subject to the stated conditions and reasons.

“That the recommendation be approved and the application be granted subject to the conditions and for the reasons stated or referred to in the report and subject to additional condition to prevent drinking outside of designated seating area.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Sefton Planning Committee minutes, 15 October 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Sefton's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Sefton
Date
Wednesday 15 October 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

10 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →